Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 10;51(8):1122–1135. doi: 10.1177/14034948221110019

Table I.

Description of included studies. Principal outcomes are given with 95% confidence interval.

Author, publication year Cohort, start, country Follow-up, years Participants, a n sub-cohort Age, b years Education, years Manual workers, % Women, % Reference Exposure c and principal outcomes
Bickel et al., 1994 1986, Germany 7.8 314 74 34% 64% Crude annual incidence rate: O: professional: 7.1; occupied solely with housework or helping in family business: 10.1
Cadar et al., 2018 2002, UK 7 1808, born 1900–1925 81 8.3 58% More privileged Adjusted, E: HR=0.72 (0.49–1.07); N: HR=1.11 (0.68–1.81); W: HR=1.35 (0.85–2.14)
4412, born 1926–1943 71 9.2 53% Adjusted, E: HR=1.21 (0.81–1.79); N: HR=1.50 (0.91–2.49); W: HR=1.68 (1.05–2.86)
Chen et al., 2011 2001, China 7.5 1526 72 9.5 24% 43% More privileged Adjusted, E: OR=2.12 (1.03–4.38); I: OR=1.13 (0.56–2.24); O: OR=1.33 (0.60–2.99)
Contador et al., 2015 1994, Spain, 3.8 2711 73 6.9 85% 57% More privileged Adjusted, N: RR=4.36 (2.35–8.09)
De Deyn et al., 2011 2006, Belgium 3 825 78 9.3 63% Crude annual proportion of cases: N: high mean education: 5.9%; low mean education level: 10.1%
Evans et al., 1997 1982, USA 4.3 642 74 9.1 56% Less privileged Adjusted, E: OR=0.83 (0.75–0.92); I: OR=0.80 (0.63–1.02); O: OR=0.96 (0.93–0.99)
Hasselgren et al., 2019 2000, Sweden 10 580 71 9.1 44% 61% Less privileged Adjusted, E: HR=0.72 (0.35–1.49); O: HR=0.91 (0.49–1.71)
Karp et al., 2004 1987, Sweden 3 931 81 8.2 35% 76% More privileged Adjusted, O: RR=1.1 (0.7–1.7)
Letellier et al., 2018 1999, France 12 7016 74 18 62% Less privileged Adjusted, E: HR=0.57 (0.49–0.67); I: HR=0.72 (0.62–0.84)
More privileged Adjusted, O: HR=1.64 (1.39–1.94); LA: HR=1.03 (0.91–1.17); N: HR=1.15 (0.93–1.42)
Ouvrard et al., 2020 1988, France 25 3431 75 57% Less privileged Adjusted, N: HR=1.10 (0.89–1.36)
Paykel et al., 1994 1988, UK 2.4 483 82 59% 66% Crude annual incidence rate, O: higher occupational class 3.6 (2.5–5.2); lower occupational class: 4.4 (2.9–6.8)
Samuel et al., 2020 2012, USA 5 3785 76 12.6 58% 56% Less privileged Adjusted, E: hOR=0.73 (0.65–0.83); I: hOR=0.84 (0.74–0.95); O: hOR=1.10 (0.97–1.24)
Stern et al., 2020 1988, USA 3 593 74 9.6 55% 73% More privileged Adjusted, E: HR=2.02 (1.33–3.06); O: HR=2.25 (1.32–3.84)
Takasugi et al., 2019 2010, Japan 6 24,175, males 74 9.9 18% 0% More privileged Adjusted, E: HR=1.34 (1.04–1.73); I: HR=0.97 (0.83–1.13); O: HR=1.25 (0.99–1.58)
27,888, females 74 9.0 39% 100% Adjusted, E: HR=1.21 (1.00–1.45); I: HR=0.83 (0.72–0.96); O: HR=0.95 (0.80–1.13)
Yaffe et al., 2013 1997, USA 6 1019, black 73 12.6 47% More privileged Adjusted, E: HR=1.75 (1.26–2.43); I: HR=1.45 (1.07–1.96),
1438, white 74 10.8 55% Adjusted, E: HR=0.99 (0.66–1.47); I: HR=1.49 (0.80–2.77)
a

Participants at follow-up.

b

Age at baseline.

c

Exposure: O: occupation; E: education; N: neighbourhood; W: wealth; I: income; LA: living alone.

HR: hazard ratio; RR: relative risk; OR: odds ratio.