Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 9;10:2037–2048. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S432542

Table 4.

Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Prognostic Factors Affecting OS

Variable Univariate Cox Analysis Multivariate Cox Analysis
HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value
Sex (male vs female) 2.528 0.589–10.854 0.196
Age(<55 vs ≥55) 0.875 0.441–1.736 0.703
ECOG PS (0 vs.1/2) 2.331 0.107–4.907 0.720
Extrahepatic metastasis (yes vs no) 0.705 0.305–1.631 0.364
BED (<50Gy vs ≥50Gy) 0.792 0.399–1.567 0.502
GTV (<544mL vs ≥544mL) 1.370 0.678–2.768 0.358
Child-Pugh (Grade A vs Grade B) 0.736 0.322–1.686 0.430
AFP (<400ng/mL vs ≥400ng/mL) 1.104 0.557–2.189 0.776
*AFP dropped to normal (yes vs no) 0.141 0.068–0.295 0.0009 0.145 0.032–0.648 0.011
#AFP reduced by half (yes vs no) 2.468 1.201–5.071 0.011 0.629 0.303–1.303 0.212
Previously treated with TACE (yes vs no) 0.888 0.448–1.762 0.731

Notes: *AFP dropped to normal 3 months after radiotherapy. #AFP reduced by half 1 month after radiotherapy. Statistically significant data has been highlighted in red according to multivariate cox analysis.

Abbreviations: ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; BED, Equivalent Biological Dose; GTV, Gross Tumor Volume; AFP, a-fetoprotein; TACE, Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization/.