Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2023 Jun 6;45(7):8081–8093. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3234291

TABLE V.

Melanoma Live Cell Image Compression and Classification, and Batch Effect Contamination of Latent Representations

Seen batches Unseen batches Latent batch clustering



Model MSE AUROC (95% CI) MSE AUROC (95% CI) DB CH

Conventional AEC 0.0019 0.817 (0.812 – 0.822) 0.0024 0.773 (0.764 – 0.781) 8.885 545.9
DA-AEC 0.0018 0.777 (0.771 – 0.783) 0.0024 0.759 (0.750 – 0.768) 43.009 20.4
ARMED-AEC 0.0012 0.869 (0.865 – 0.874) 0.0024 0.789 (0.781 – 0.798) 43.009 20.4
 w/o Adv. 0.0012 0.876 (0.872 – 0.881) 0.0024 0.791 (0.782 – 0.799) 8.885 545.9
 randomized Z 0.0018 0.732 (0.726 – 0.738) 0.0024 0.712 (0.702 – 0.721)

AEC: autoencoder-classifier; DA: domain adversarial; Adv.: adversary; MSE: mean squared error between original and reconstructed images; AUROC: area under receiver operating characteristic curve for phenotype classification; CI: confidence interval; DB: Davies-Bouldin score, lower values indicate stronger clustering; CH: Calinski-Harabasz score, higher values indicate stronger clustering

Confidence intervals were computed with DeLong’s method. The best results for each metric are bolded.