TABLE V.
Melanoma Live Cell Image Compression and Classification, and Batch Effect Contamination of Latent Representations
| Seen batches | Unseen batches | Latent batch clustering | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  | ||||
| Model | MSE | AUROC (95% CI) | MSE | AUROC (95% CI) | DB | CH | 
|  | ||||||
| Conventional AEC | 0.0019 | 0.817 (0.812 – 0.822) | 0.0024 | 0.773 (0.764 – 0.781) | 8.885 | 545.9 | 
| DA-AEC | 0.0018 | 0.777 (0.771 – 0.783) | 0.0024 | 0.759 (0.750 – 0.768) | 43.009 | 20.4 | 
| ARMED-AEC | 0.0012 | 0.869 (0.865 – 0.874) | 0.0024 | 0.789 (0.781 – 0.798) | 43.009 | 20.4 | 
| w/o Adv. | 0.0012 | 0.876 (0.872 – 0.881) | 0.0024 | 0.791 (0.782 – 0.799) | 8.885 | 545.9 | 
| randomized Z | 0.0018 | 0.732 (0.726 – 0.738) | 0.0024 | 0.712 (0.702 – 0.721) | ||
AEC: autoencoder-classifier; DA: domain adversarial; Adv.: adversary; MSE: mean squared error between original and reconstructed images; AUROC: area under receiver operating characteristic curve for phenotype classification; CI: confidence interval; DB: Davies-Bouldin score, lower values indicate stronger clustering; CH: Calinski-Harabasz score, higher values indicate stronger clustering
Confidence intervals were computed with DeLong’s method. The best results for each metric are bolded.