Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 14;18:866. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04292-5

Table 2.

Quality assessment for the nine cohort studies according to Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS)

Study Year S C E Total score
S1 S2 S3 S4 C1 C2 E1 E2 E3
Baek [22] 2023 9
Wang [23] 2023 9
Wang [24] 2023 8
Zhou [13] 2021 9
Woo [26] 2020 9
Yi [27] 2019 8
Rigby [1] 2019 8
Li [28] 2017 8
Matsui [30] 2016 8

★: The scale uses a star symbol (★) to represent points, and each star represents one point

S selection, C comparability, E exposure. S1 representativeness of the exposed cohort, S2 selection of the nonexposed cohort, S3 ascertainment of exposure, S4 demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study. C1 comparability of controls for the most important factor, C2 comparability of controls for a second important factor. E1 assessment of outcome, E2 was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur, E3 adequacy of follow-up of cohorts