Fig. 3.

Interregional correlations for connectivity and painful procedures. A Interregional correlation r-values for each comparison, colored by p-value. Following false discovery rate (FDR) correction, cerebellum to association, paralimbic, limbic, and cerebellum as well as subcortical to limbic remained significant and are highlighted in yellow. B,C Significant relationship for inter-cerebellar connectivity with skin breaks, alongside ROI-to-ROI connections sensitive to pain. D–G Significant relationship for other regional connections and breaks. No significant ROI-to-ROI connections survived multiple comparison corrections across these regions