Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 31;11:1282877. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282877

Table 3.

Debriefing questions (n = 472).

Variable Frequency %
How sure are you that you would be willing to pay this amount in a real situation? (if WTP > 0)
Very unsure 0 0.0
Unsure 12 2.5
Sure 106 22.0
Very sure 100 21.0
Not applicable (WTP = 0) 254 54.0
When you decided on your WTP, did you believe that your community authorities will be successful in ensuring the continuous offering of community PA programs?
Yes 335 71.0
No 137 29.0
When you decided on your WTP, did you agree with the idea that you will pay through your monthly electricity bill?
Yes 234 50.0
No 238 50.0
Do you think the city government would use the results of this study to set new tariffs and implement the new plan?
Yes 300 64.0
No 172 36.0
What is the main reason why you are not willing to pay anything?
I cannot afford the additional monthly payment 20 7.8
I am not sure about the sustainability of the plan 6 2.3
I do not like the additional charges to be added to my electricity bill 21 8.2
I do not like our community authorities or other government authorities managing these community PA programs. 2 0.8
I do not see the need for funding for the continuous offering of community PA programs 18 7.0
It is the government’s responsibility, not mine, to pay for the community PA programs 20 7.8
The informant can pay support from 1 to 24 baht 187 73.0

n = 472, except for last question which was only asked of respondents who chose the zero WTP bid level (n = 256). WTP, willingness to pay; PA, physical activity.