Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Neural Eng. 2022 May 4;19(2):10.1088/1741-2552/ac697c. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac697c

Table 2.

Energy consumption of the proposed coil designs in comparison with that of commercial coils. The energy required for a neural stimulation threshold of 100 V m−1 at 3 cm from the head’s surface, along with the footprint and the half penetration depth of each coil. Different AT coil parameters have been studied to demonstrate the performance trend of these coils.

Coil Type d1/2 (cm) Footprint (cm2) Energy (J)

Commercial Coils

25 mm Figure-8 (#25) 0.96 27.71 670
70 mm Figure-8 (#31) 1.41 118.9 170

Effect of Tilting Angle (OD-9, 5 Windings)

AT Single 10° 1.78 62.65 160
AT Single 40° 1.7 59.78 320
AT Single 70° 1.61 21.76 610

Effect of Winding Layers (OD-9, 70° Tilted)

AT Single—2 Windings 1.55 21.76 390
AT Single—5 Windings 1.61 21.76 610
AT Single—9 Windings 1.69 21.76 960

Effect of Outer Diameter (5 Windings, 70° Tilted)

AT Single—OD-4.5 1.4 5.44 1090
AT Single—OD-9 1.61 21.76 610
AT Single—OD-16 1.85 68.77 360

Effect of Outer Diameter (4-Coil System)

4-AT Coils OD-6 2.05 38.68 1730
4-AT Coils OD-9 2.46 87.04 1470