Table 5.
Final model for the prediction of subjective success after sessions by the strategies.
| B | SE | 95% CI | t | p | df | Sum/Mean Sq | F ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed effects | ||||||||
| Intercept | 4.62 | 0.25 | [4.13, 5.11] | 18.14 | 0.175 | |||
| Behavior | −0.25 | 0.22 | [−0.66, 0.17] | −1.16 | 0.242 | F (1, 174) | 1.46 | 1.36 |
| Concentration | −0.85 | 0.29 | [−1.40, −0.25] | −2.92 | 0.004 | F (1, 168) | 9.20 | 8.55 |
| Distraction | 0.07 | 0.24 | [−0.38, 0.55] | 0.30 | 0.767 | F (1, 115) | 0.10 | 0.08 |
| Emotion | −0.10 | 0.23 | [−0.53, 0.35] | −2.42 | 0.677 | F (1, 126) | 0.19 | 0.17 |
| Imagination | 0.40 | 0.22 | [−0.03, 0.82] | 1.79 | 0.076 | F (1, 160) | 3.44 | 3.20 |
| Self-Talk | 0.09 | 0.34 | [−0.59, 0.73] | 0.25 | 0.802 | F (1, 160) | 0.07 | 0.06 |
| Thought | 0.17 | 0.23 | [0.27, 0.61] | 0.76 | 0.451 | F (1, 167) | 0.61 | 0.57 |
| Random effects | Variance | SD |
|---|---|---|
| Participant (intercept) | 0.27 | 0.52 |
| Model fit | ||
|---|---|---|
| R 2 | Marginal | Conditional |
| 0.10 | 0.28 | |
p-values for fixed effects calculated using Satterthwaite’s approximations. Confidence intervals have been calculated using the Wald method. All strategies were dummy-coded (0 = Strategy was not applied in the respective session, 1 = Strategy was applied in the respective session). Model equation: Subjective success ~ Concentration + Imagination + Self-Talk + Distraction + Thought + Emotion + Behavior + (1 | participant). Due to its rare occurrence, the category “No Strategy” was not included in the analyses.