Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 24;2015(3):CD010621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010621.pub2

Comparison 1. Corneal collagen cross‐linking versus sham or no treatment.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Primary outcomes 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 Progression (increase in maximal keratometry) at 12 months after treatment 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Progression (Increase in maximal keratometry) at 36 months after treatment 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Secondary outcomes 2   Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 Mean maximal keratometry in dioptres at 12 months after treatment 1   Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 Mean uncorrected visual acuity at 12 months after treatment 1   Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.3 Change in mean corneal thickness (µm) at the thinnest part of the cornea 12 months after treatment 2   Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.4 Mean average corneal power in dioptres at 12 months after treatment 2   Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.5 Mean absolute spherical equivalent at 12 months after treatment 1   Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]