PROGRESS |
Plus |
Health literacy |
Study1 |
Place of residence; time living in host country |
Race/ethnicity/culture/language |
Occupation |
Gender |
Religion |
Education |
Socioeconomic status, social capital |
Age, sexual orientation, disability, migrant status |
Assessment tool, range |
Bailey 2012 (No. analysed = 202) |
|
Chinese, Korean, Russian, Spanish, Vietnamese
Primary languages: Chinese, Korean, Russian, Spanish, Vietnamese
|
— |
|
— |
19.8% < 9 years, 14.4% 9 to 11 years, 29.2% 12 years or GED, 14.9% some college, 21.8% ≥ college graduate
|
Annual income: 44.7% < USD 10,000, 36.7% USD 10,000 to USD 19,999, 18.6% ≥ USD 20,000
|
63.6 (0.91)*, range 18 to 85
The sample included participants with prescribed medication in the past year; medication use 4.5 (0.2)*
|
— |
Bloom 2014 Total N = 230 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
Calderón 2014 (Total N = 240) |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
Annual income: 75.6% < USD 10,000, 24.4% ≥ USD 10,000
Health insurance: 31.3% insured
|
20.7% 18 to 39 years, 88.6% 40 to 60 years, 20.7% > 60 years
Participants sought health care at a clinic; 79% self‐reported fair or poor general health status
|
S‐TOFHLA, 0 to 36; 58.0% 0 to 16 (inadequate HL), 8.0% 17 to 21 (marginal HL), 34.0% 22 to 36 (adequate HL)
|
DeCamp 2020 (Total N = 157) |
|
|
|
— |
— |
|
Annual income: 42.7% < USD 20.000, 24.2% USD 20.000 to USD 30.000, 7.6% > USD 30.000, 19.1% did not report or unknown
Health insurance: all children publicly insured
20.3% single, 79.6% spouse or partner
|
|
NVS, 0 to 6; 48.4% 0 to 1 (limited HL), 38.2% 2 to 3 (marginal HL), 13.4% 4 to 6 (adequate HL)
English proficiency was assessed using the US Census Bureau question "How well do you speak English?", overall results not reported
|
Elder 1998 (No. only Latinos = 341) |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
Gwede 2019 (Total N = 76) |
|
|
n = 75
|
|
— |
|
n = 70
Annual income: 44.3% < USD 10,000, 55.1% ≥ USD 10,000
Health insurance: 25.5% insured
69.7% married/living together, 13.1% divorced/separated, 7.9% widowed, 9.2% never married/single
|
|
SILS, 0 to 5; 47.4% always difficult reading written materials, 52.6% not always difficult reading written materials, 75.0% very confident in completing health forms, 25.0% less than very confident in completing health forms
|
Han 2017 (Total N = 560) |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
26.4% very comfortable or comfortable, 34.5% just OK, 39.5% uncomfortable or very uncomfortable
Health insurance: 37.9% insured
85.5% married or partnered, 11.1% separated, widowed or divorced, 3.4% never married
|
|
|
Hernandez 2013 (Total N = 146) |
|
|
|
|
— |
36.6% grade school, 25.3% middle school, 14.0% some high school, 10.5% high school or GED, 10.5% some college or beyond
|
Annual income: 69.7% < USD 19,000, 19.0% USD 20,000 to USD 30,000, 11.2% > USD 30,000
Health insurance: 45.0% insured
58.4% married, 24.6% living with partner, 7.7% never married, 9.1% divorced or widowed
|
Range 18 to 55
At risk for depression
|
S‐TOFHLA, 0 to 36; 28.1% 0 to 16 (inadequate HL), 12.6% 17 to 21 (marginal HL), 59.1% 22 to 36 (adequate HL)
|
Kaur 2019 (Total N = 140) |
|
|
63.6% full‐time workers (including 14.3% self‐employed), 5.0% part‐time workers, 1.4% occasional workers, 22.1% homemakers, 2.9% unemployed
|
|
— |
|
Annual income: 52.1% CAD 0 to 49,999, 19.3% CAD 50,000 to 89,999, 6.4% CAD 90,000+, 20.7% unknown
Health insurance: 72.9% insured
|
|
|
Kheir 2014 (Total N = 123) |
|
Asians
0.8% Malayalam, 16.3% Nepal, 1.6% Urdu, 8.9% Tagalog, 22.8% Bangla, 49.6% other
Level of English: 13.8% good, 16.3% average, 94.3% poor
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
Kim 2009 (No. analysed = 79) |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
56.4 (7.9)*
Type 2 diabetes
|
— |
Kim 2014 (No. analysed = 369) |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
Kim 2020 (No. analysed = 209) |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Monthly income, mean (SD): USD 3780 (3411)*, 63.2% own housing, 67.7% comfortable living
Health insurance: 50.2% insured
89.5% married, family size, persons: 3.0 (1.2)*
|
58.7 (8.4)*
Type 2 diabetes
|
REALM, 0 to 66; 32.1 (1.5)***, indicating 6th grade reading level
DM‐REALM, 0 to 88; 51.3 (1.7)***, 7.3 points above the scale’s midpoint
Comprehension scale, 0 to 28; 15.3 (0.6)***
S‐TOFHLA, numeracy subscale, 0 to 7; 4.2 (0.2)***
NVS, 0‐6; 1.7 (0.1)***
|
Kiropoulos 2011 (Total N = 202) |
Urban, Australia
43.8 (9.0)*
|
|
5.0% never worked, 57.9% unskilled, 31.2% tradesperson/clerical, 4.0% manager/professional, 28.2% working now, 70.8% are not working now
|
|
— |
15.3% no/incomplete primary, 42.1% completed primary, 24.3% some secondary school, 9.9% all secondary school, 8.4% some/completed tertiary
|
28.2% married,71.8% not married, 14.9% living with spouse, 52.0% living with children, 24.8% living with other relatives, 14.4% currently living alone, 85.6% not currently living alone
|
|
|
Koniak‐Griffin 2015 (Total N = 223) |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Annual income: 54.7% ≤ USD 20,000, 28.7% USD 20,001 to 40,.000, 16.6% USD 40,001 to 75,000
Health insurance: 31.8% insured
72.2% married/living with a partner, 27.8% divorced/widowed/single
|
44.6 (7.9)*
6.3% diabetes (clinical data), 12.1% hypertension ((BP ≥ 140/90, self‐report); 25% felt depressed or "bothered by loss of interest", 22.0% both
|
— |
Lepore 2012 (No. analysed = 431 for survey data, N = 490 for medical claims data) |
|
|
— |
|
— |
N = 490
|
|
|
— |
Mohan 2014 (No. analysed = 200) |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
Ochoa 2020 (No. analysed = 109) |
|
Latinas
English‐speaking proficiency: 29.4% very well/well, 70.6% not very well/not at all; English reading proficiency: 35.6% very well/well, 64.4% not very well/not at all; English writing proficiency: 31.0% very well/well, 69.0% not very well/not at all
|
— |
|
— |
N = 232
|
N = 232
Annual income: 41.6% < USD 20,000, 35.4% USD 20,000 to < 40,000, 16.05% USD 40,000 to < 60,000, 6.9% ≥ USD 60,000
Health insurance: 73.45% insured
78.95% married/living with partner, 10.7% separated/divorced/widowed, 10.35% never married (single)
|
Range 25 to 45
Health status: 1.4% very poor or poor, 13.2% fair, 3.8% good, 17.65% very good, 30.9% excellent
|
— |
Otilingam 2015 (Total N = 100) |
|
|
— |
|
— |
(Highest degree): 41.0% none or elementary, 35.0% high school, 10.0% community/technical college, 14.0% college
|
|
|
n = 73
|
Payán 2020 (No. analysed = 193) |
Urban, USA
69.9% ≥ 15 y (N = 240)
|
Latinas
English proficiency: 4.2% very well, 13.8% well, 31.3% not well, 28.3% almost none, 22.5% not at all well (N = 240)
|
— |
|
— |
N = 240
|
N = 240
Annual household income: 93.4% < USD 30,000
Health insurance: 79.6% insured
46.8% married, 30.5% separated, 22.7% single
|
|
— |
Poureslami 2016a (No. analysed = 85) |
|
|
|
|
— |
17.6% never attended formal school, 24.7% completed elementary school, 34.1% completed high school, 23.5% post‐high school education
|
— |
|
— |
Poureslami 2016b (Total N = 91) |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
Rosal 2005 (No. analysed = 25) |
|
Hispanic (Puerto Rican)
95% spoke Spanish only
|
24.0% housewife, 20.0% disabled, 4.0% unemployed, 4.0% never worked, 48.0% pension
|
|
— |
|
Annual income: 84.0% ≤ USD 10,000/per year, 16.0% USD 10,001 to 20,000
Health insurance: 40.0% Medicaid only, 60.0% Medicaid and supplemental
|
62.6 (8.6)*, range 45 to 82
Type 2 diabetes; perceived health: 4.0% excellent, 4.0% very good, 8.0% good, 72.0% fair, 12.0% poor; years with diagnosed diabetes 8.2 (5.8)*, 16.0% diabetes related complications, 84.0% 1 complication, 84.0% ≥ 1 family member with diabetes
|
— |
Rosal 2011 (Total N = 252) |
|
|
n = 230
11.3% working full or part‐time, 3.5% unemployed/looking for a job,
61.7% disabled, 10.9% retired, 12.6% housewife |
|
— |
28.0% ≤ 4th grade, 28.0% 5th to 8th grade, 19.2% 9th to 12th grade (not high school graduate), 24.8% ≥ high school
|
Annual income: 55.3% < USD 10,000
Health insurance: 89.3% public insurance, 6.0% commercial insurance, 2.8% free care, 2.0% no insurance
25.8% married or living with partner, 39.0% divorced/widowed/separated, 25.2% never married
|
16.3% 18 to 44 y, 29.8% 45 to 54 y, 32.9% 55 to 64 y, 21.0% ≥ 65 y
Documented diagnosis of type 2 diabetes; HbA1c (previous 7 months) ≥ 7.5%
|
— |
Soto Mas 2018 (Total N = 181) |
|
|
— |
|
— |
n = 155
5.2% elementary school, 11.7% middle school, 40.9% high school, 18.8% associate/technical degree, 20.1% bachelor's degree, 1.9% master's degree, 1.3% doctoral degree
|
— |
n = 155
|
n = 155
|
Sudore 2018 (No. of Spanish‐speaking participants = 445) |
|
|
— |
|
49.9% fairly to extremely religious, 59.6% fairly to extremely spiritual |
|
27.4% not enough to make ends meet, financial social standing (1 to 10 score): 5.6*
Measure of social support score (total, 11 to 55): 36.7*, 37.5% in a marriage or long‐term relationship, 88.8% have adult children, 98.0% have a potential surrogate
|
|
|
Taylor 2011 (Total N = 180) |
|
Asian
Cantonese, Farsi, Korean, Mandarin, Punjabi
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
Thompson 2012 (Total N = 170) |
Urban, USA
6.05* (n = 158)
|
|
— |
|
— |
n = 159
|
|
|
— |
Tong 2017 (Total N = 329) |
|
Hmong Americans (born in Laos)
89.4% speak only Hmong at home, 70.5% speak English poorly or not at all
|
|
|
— |
|
Annual income: 53.8% < USD 20,000, 4.0% USD 20,000 or more, 42.2% don't know/missing
Health insurance: 95.1% insured
65.3% married or living with a partner
|
|
— |
Unger 2013 (No. analysed = 139) |
Urban, USA
43.2% 11 y or more, 18.7% 6 to 10 y, 13.7% 1 to 5 y, 5.8% less than 1 y, missing 2.9%
|
Hispanics/Latinos
Language spoken at home: 28.1% only Spanish, 38.1% mostly Spanish, 27.3% English and Spanish equally, 4.3% mostly English, 1.4% only English, 0.7% missing
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
Valdez 2015 (Total N = 708) |
|
|
— |
n = 707
|
— |
19.6% < 6, 16.7% 7 to 11 years, 18.5% 12 years, 9.9% 13 to 15 years, 35.3% 16+
|
n = 707
83.9% child has regular doctor
Number of children: 2.8*; 52.3% 1 to 2, 39.4% 3 to 4, 8.3% 5+; 72.7% married/living together
|
n = 691
41.7*; 12.3% < 35 years, 22.3% 35 to 39 years, 34.6% 40 to 44 years, 17.2% 45 to 49 years, 11.2% 50+ years
|
— |
Valdez 2018 (No. analysed = 727) |
|
|
— |
|
— |
N = 943
8.2 (3.8)*, 39.0% 1 to 6 years, 34.0% 7 to 11 years, 21.0% 12 years, 6.0% 13+ years
|
Inclusion criteria: annual household income of ≤ USD 24,680
Health insurance: 51.0% insured (N = 943)
21.0% single, 43.0% married, 15.0% living together, 15.0% divorced/separated, 5.0% widowed; number of children: 3.0 (2.2)*; 10.0% no children, 14.0% one child, 21.0% two children, 22.0% three children, 15.0% four children, 18.0% 5+ children (n = 943)
|
|
— |
van Servellen 2005 (No. analysed = 85) |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
Wong 2020 (No. analysed = 39) |
|
|
|
|
n = 38
|
n = 38
|
n = 38
|
|
n = 37
DLQ, 22‐item, true/false questions, 0 to 22 (validated tool) Intervention group, mean: 11.06*
|