Table 3.
FACTOR | UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS OR (95% CI), P VALUE |
MODEL 1* (BIC=138.35) OR (95% CI), P VALUE |
MODEL 2* (BIC=125.49) OR (95% CI), P VALUE |
---|---|---|---|
Asking Socratic questions | 4.21 (1.30-13.67), P=.02 | 3.28 (0.74-14.47), P=.12 | 3.09 (0.79-12.10), P=.11 |
Providing psychoeducation | 3.60 (1.35-9.63), P=.01 | 1.89 (0.57-6.29), P=.30 | 2.10 (0.66-6.75), P=.21 |
Assigning homework | 4.21 (1.30-13.67), P=.02 | 2.16 (0.44-10.76), P=.35 | 2.58 (0.56-11.81), P=.22 |
Participating in a supervised education group | 2.25 (1.05-4.82), P=.04 | 1.03 (0.32-3.28), P=.96 | 1.00 (0.32-3.09), P=.99 |
Having patients experience positive effects | 7.50 (1.91-29.50), P<.01 | 2.23 (0.12-40.73), P=.59 | 2.44 (0.12-48.02), P=.56 |
Participating in a refresher course | 2.44 (1.13-5.27), P=.02 | 2.85 (0.84-9.66), P=.09 | 2.62 (0.83-8.23), P=.10 |
Having an office colleague who uses CBT | 2.81 (1.06-7.50), P=.04 | 3.64 (0.79-16.72), P=.10 | 4.11 (0.91-18.47), P=.07 |
Assigning a daily activity log | 2.03 (0.82-5.02), P=.13 | 0.87 (0.27-2.76), P=.81 | NA |
Using the anxiety curve | 1.98 (0.77-5.10), P=.16 | 1.29 (0.40-4.24), P=.67 | NA |
Evaluation | 2.05 (0.83-5.08), P=.12 | 1.62 (0.51-5.16), P=.41 | NA |
Setting an agenda | 1.44 (0.55-3.81), P=.46 | NA | NA |
Using problem lists | 0.79 (0.20-3.18), P=.74 | NA | NA |
Reviewing homework | 1.53 (0.34-6.88), P=.58 | NA | NA |
Using the ABC model | 0.51 (0.10-2.52), P=.41 | NA | NA |
Discussing the panic cycle | 1.43 (0.58-3.52), P=.44 | NA | NA |
Using a case formulation approach | 1.18 (0.47-2.96), P=.73 | NA | NA |
Providing summaries at the end of consultations | 1.06 (0.36-3.13), P=.91 | NA | NA |
Cooperating with local specialists | 1.49 (0.60-3.71), P=.39 | NA | NA |
Having fixed time for CBT | 1.49 (0.68-3.29), P=.32 | NA | NA |
Having economic incentives | 1.63 (0.71-3.70), P=.25 | NA | NA |
ABC—Activating event, Belief, Consequence32; BIC—Bayesian information criteria; CBT—cognitive behavioural therapy; NA—not applicable; OR—odds ratio.
Models 1 and 2 are based on variables with P≤.20 and P≤.05, respectively, from the univariate analysis. Model 2 was chosen for the analysis because of its smaller BIC estimate.