Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 28;2014(1):CD009633. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009633.pub2

Summary of findings 2. Clonidine compared to midazolam for postoperative analgesia in children.

Clonidine compared to midazolam for postoperative analgesia in children
Patient or population: patients with postoperative pain
 Settings: paediatric surgery
 Intervention: clonidine
 Comparison: midazolam
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Midazolam Clonidine
Number requiring additional analgesia at any time postoperatively ‐ low dose clonidine 800 per 1000 200 per 1000 
 (72 to 568) RR 0.25 
 (0.09 to 0.71) 30
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1,2  
Number requiring additional analgesia at any time postoperatively ‐ high dose clonidine 800 per 1000 200 per 1000 
 (72 to 568) RR 0.25 
 (0.09 to 0.71) 30
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1,2  
Haemodynamic or respiratory changes requiring intervention 371 per 1000 204 per 1000 
 (115 to 360) RR 0.55 
 (0.31 to 0.97) 134
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate3  
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Minimal or no information on methods of randomization, allocation concealment or blinding.
 2 Very low patient and event numbers.
 3 Missing information on concealment of randomizations.