Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 24;141(16):1954–1970. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022017423

Table 3.

Results of clinical trials with JAKis in MF

Agent and primary targets Clinical trial and numerosity Key inclusion criteria SVR ≥35% at 24 wk Symptom reduction Relevant toxicities with agent on study Comments
RUX

JAK1/2
COMFORT-1
phase 3
RUX (n = 155) vs PBO (n = 154)
RUX 15 mg BID (PLT 100 × 109/L-200 × 109/L) or RUX 20 mg BID (PLT >200 × 109/L)
≥Int-2 MF
PLT ≥100 × 109/L
Intolerant or refractory to other available therapies
41.9% (RUX) vs 0.7% (PBO) ≥50% MFSAF TSS v2.0 at 24 wk: 45.9% (RUX) vs 5.3% (PBO) G3/4 anemia: 45.2%
G3/4 thrombocytopenia: 12.9%
G3/4 neutropenia: 7.1%
Rate of nonhematological toxicities and discontinuation for AEs: (11%) like PBO
Median OS in pooled analysis: 5.3 y (RUX) vs 3.8 y (PBO/BAT)
COMFORT-2
phase 3
RUX (n = 146) vs BAT (n = 73)
RUX initial doses as in COMFORT-1
≥Int-2 MF
PLT ≥100 × 109/L
32% (RUX) vs 0% (BAT) EORTC QLQ-C30 mean change from BL: +9.1 (RUX) vs +3.4 (BAT)
FACT-Lym score mean change from BL: +11.3 (RUX) vs −0.9 (BAT)
G3/4 anemia: 42%
G3/4 thrombocytopenia: 8%
Any grade diarrhea: 23%
Discontinuation for AEs 8% (RUX) vs 5% (BAT)
FEDR

JAK2
JAK1
TYK2
JAK3
JAKARTA
phase 3
FEDR (n = 193) vs PBO (n = 96)
FEDR 400 or 500 mg QD
≥Int-2 MF
PLT ≥50 × 109/L
JAKI-naïve
36% (FEDR 400 mg with 4 wk later confirmation) and 40% (FEDR 500 mg) vs 1% (PBO) ≥50% modified MFSAF TSS at 24 wk: 36% (FEDR 400 mg) and 34% (FEDR 500 mg) vs 7% (PBO) G3/4 anemia: 43% (FEDR 400 mg); 60% (FEDR 500 mg)
G3/4 thrombocytopenia: 17% (FEDR 400 mg); 27% (FEDR 500 mg)
G3/4 neutropenia: 8% (FEDR 400 mg); 18% (FEDR 500 mg)
Frequent GI toxicity (mostly G1/2)
Encephalopathy in 4 of 97 patients in the FEDR 500 mg group
Suspected cases of Wernicke encephalopathy (WE) led to early study termination; in 2017, however, the FDA decided to lift the clinical hold based on updated clinical data
JAKARTA-2
phase 2
FEDR (n = 97)
FEDR 400 mg QD
Int-1 with symptoms, Int-2 or high-risk MF
PLT ≥50 × 109/L
RUX resistant, intolerant
55% (30% with stringent RUX failure criteria) ≥50% modified MFSAF TSS at 24 wk: 26% G3/4 anemia: 38%
G3/4 thrombocytopenia: 22%
Frequent GI toxicity (mostly G1/2)
FREEDOM
NCT03755518
phase 3b
FEDR (estimated n = 110)
FEDR 400 mg QD
Int/high-risk MF
PLT ≥50 × 109/L
RUX exposed
Primary end point Secondary end point Out of n = 34 evaluable patients
G3/4 anemia: 21%
G3/4 thrombocytopenia: 6%
Modest GI toxicity (mostly G1/2)
These studies included prospective strategies for preventing or mitigating GI AEs, thiamine level decreases, and potential WE

Ongoing
FREEDOM 2
NCT03952039
phase 3
FEDR vs BAT (estimated n = 192)
FEDR 400 mg QD
≥Int-2 MF
PLT ≥50 × 109/L
RUX refractory, resistant or intolerant
Primary end point Secondary end point Secondary end point
PAC

JAK2
FLT3
IRAK1
CSF1R
ACVR1
PERSIST-1
phase 3
PAC (n = 220) vs BAT (n = 107, excl. JAKi)
PAC 400 mg QD
≥Int-1 risk MF
JAKi-naïve
No exclusions for cytopenia
19% (PAC) vs 5% (BAT) ≥50% MPNSAF TSS at 24 wk: no significant benefit vs BAT G3/4 anemia: 17%
G3/4 thrombocytopenia: 12%
G3/4 diarrhea: 5%
Heart failure: 2%
PERSIST-1: 25% of TD patients achieved TI
Full clinical hold Feb2016/Jan2017 for fatal hemorrhagic and cardiac toxicity concerns, lifted after updated clinical data
PERSIST-2
phase 3
PAC (n = 211) vs BAT (n = 100, including RUX)
PAC 400 mg QD or 200 mg BID
≥Int-1 risk MF
PLT <100 × 109/L
Previously treated or JAKi-naïve
48% had prior RUX and BAT included RUX in 45%
18% (PAC) vs 3% (BAT)
22%, if PAC at 200 mg BID
≥50% MPNSAF TSS at 24 wk: 25% (PAC) vs 14% (BAT)
32%, if PAC at 200 mg BID
Toxicities less frequent in PAC BID dosing compared with QD
Cardiac AEs: 7% at PAC 200 mg BID and 13% at PAC 400 mg QD
Intracranial hemorrhage: 1% (PAC QD)
PAC203
phase 2
PAC (n = 165)
PAC 100 mg QD or 100 mg BID or 200 mg BID
≥Int-1 risk MF
Any PLT count
RUX failure or intolerance
9.3% (PAC 200 mg BID) vs 1.8% (100 mg BID) vs 0% (100 mg QD)
16.7%, if PAC at 200 mg BID and BL PLT <50 × 109/L
≥50% MPNSAF TSS at 24 wk: similar among arms (around 7.5%) G3/4 anemia: 20.4% at 200 mg BID
G3/4 thrombocytopenia: 33.3% at 200 mg BID
Common GI toxicity, mostly G1/2 at PAC 200 mg BID
Uncommon severe cardiac events and bleedings
PACIFICA
NCT03165734
phase 3
PAC 200 mg BID vs physician’s choice (estimated n = 348)
≥Int-1 risk MF
PLT <50 × 109/L
No or limited exposure to any JAKi
Primary end point Primary end point Secondary end point Ongoing
MMB

JAK1
JAK2
ACVR1
SIMPLIFY-1
phase 3
MMB (n = 215) vs RUX (n = 217)
MMB 200 mg QD
Int-1 with symptoms, Int-2 or high-risk MF
PLT ≥50 × 109/L
JAKi naïve
MMB not inferior to RUX (26.5% vs 29%) ≥50% MPNSAF TSS at 24 wk: MMB inferior to RUX (28.4% vs 42.2%) G3/4 anemia: 6%
G3/4 thrombocytopenia: 7%
All grade PN: 10%
TI at 24 wk: MMB associated with significantly reduced RBC transfusions needs
Correlation between TI at 24 wk and OS (trend in SIMPLIFY-2)
SIMPLIFY-2
phase 3
MMB (n = 104) vs BAT (n = 52, 89% RUX)
MMB 200 mg QD
Int-1 with symptoms, Int-2 or high-risk MF
Any PLT count
Suboptimal response, intolerance to RUX
MMB not superior to BAT (around 7% in both arms) ≥50% MPNSAF TSS at 24 wk:
26.2% (MMB) vs 5.9% (BAT)
G3/4 anemia: 14%
G3/4 thrombocytopenia: 7%
All grade PN: 11%
MOMENTUM
phase 3
MMB (n = 130) vs Danazol (DAN, n = 65)
MMB 200 mg QD, DAN 600 mg QD
Int/high-risk symptomatic MF
Hb <10 g/dL
PLT ≥25 × 109/L
Previous exposure to any JAKi
23% (MMB) vs 3% (DAN) MFSAF TSS at 24 wk: 32% (MMB) vs 6% (DAN) G3/4 anemia: 61%
G3/4 thrombocytopenia: 28%
TI at 24 wk: 31% (MMB) vs 20% (DAN)
Jaktinib (JAKT)

JAK2
JAK1
ACVR1
TYK2
NCT03886415
phase 2
JAKT 100 mg BID vs 200 mg QD (n = 118)
≥Int-1 risk symptomatic MF
PLT ≥75 × 109/L
54.8% (JAKT 100 mg BID), 31.3% (JAKT 200 mg QD) ≥50% MFSAF TSS at 24 wk: 69.6% (JAKT 100 mg BID), 57.5% (JAKT 200 mg QD) G3/4 anemia: ∼25%
G3/4 thrombocytopenia: ∼15%
Increased Hb levels in 36% of patients with baseline Hb ≤10 g/dL
NCT04217993
phase 2b
JAKT 100 mg BID (estimated n = 43 in the extended research part)
≥Int-1 risk symptomatic MF
PLT >30 × 109/L
Intolerant to RUX
Primary end point Secondary end point Secondary end point Ongoing
NCT04851535
phase 2
JAKT 100 mg BID (estimated n = 30)
≥Int-1 risk symptomatic MF
PLT ≥75 × 109/L
Relapsed, refractory to RUX
Primary end point Secondary end point Ongoing
NCT04617028
phase 3
JAKT + PBO vs HU + PBO (estimated n = 105)
≥Int-2 MF
JAKi naïve
Primary end point Ongoing
TQ05105 (TQ)

JAK2
NCT05020652
phase 2
TQ + HU blank tablets vs TQ blank tablets + HU
≥Int-1 risk MF
PLT ≥100 × 109/L
JAKi-naïve
Primary end point Secondary end point Secondary end point Ongoing
Itacitinib (ITA)

JAK1
NCT01633372
phase 2
ITA (n = 87)
ITA 100 mg BID vs 200 mg BID vs 600 mg QD
≥Int-1 risk symptomatic MF
PLT ≥50 × 109/L
Prior JAKi not excluded
17% (across doses) ≥50% MFSAF TSS at 24 wk: 20% (100 mg BID) vs 29% (200 mg BID) vs 35% (600 mg QD) G3/4 anemia: 25%-38%
G3/4 thrombocytopenia: 15%-44%
Fatigue: 28.7%
LIMBER-213 NCT04629508
phase 2
Immediate release ITA (RP2D)
≥Int-1 risk MF
PLT ≥50 × 109/L
Previous RUX and/or FEDR
Primary end point Secondary end point Secondary end point Ongoing
NCT03144687
phase 2
Cohort A: ITA 200 mg QD + ongoing RUX at <10 mg BID (estimated n = 21)
Cohort B: ITA 600 mg QD (estimated n = 21)
PLT ≥50 × 109/L
Cohort A: patients already on RUX <10 mg BID
Cohort B: RUX failure or intolerance
Primary end point Secondary end point Secondary end point Ongoing

AE, adverse event; BAT, best available therapy; BID, twice daily; EORTC QLQ, European Organization for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire; FACT-Lym, Functional Assessment of cancer therapy-lymphoma; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; G, grade; GI, gastrointestinal; Hb, hemoglobin; HU, hydroxyurea; JAKi, JAK inhibitor; MF, myelofibrosis; MFSAF, Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form; MPNSAF, Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form; OS, overall survival; PBO, placebo; PLT, platelets; PN, peripheral neuropathy; QD, once daily; RBC, red blood cells; RP2D, recommended phase 2 dose; SVR35, spleen volume reduction of 35%; TD, transfusion-dependent; TI, transfusion-independent; TSS, total symptom score.