Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of the participants (N = 1,600).

Variables	Category	N (%)	Health literacy	t/F	P
Gender	Man	461 (28.8)	4.15 ± 0.87	3.329a	0.329
	Woman	1,139 (71.2)	4.29 ± 0.73
Age	18–30	320 (20.0)	4.21 ± 0.77	0.719b	0.540
	31–40	741 (46.3)	4.26 ± 0.29
	41–50	434 (27.1)	4.29 ± 0.77
	>50	105 (6.6)	4.20 ± 0.80
Political Appearance	The masses	906 (56.6)	4.26 ± 0.81	3.794b	0.004
	League member	231 (14.4)	4.10 ± 0.74
	Active member of the party	43 (2.7)	4.34 ± 0.54
	Preparatory party members	40 (2.5)	4.49 ± 0.75
	Communist party members	380 (23.8)	4.30 ± 0.74
Education	Junior high school or below	21 (1.3)	3.40 ± 0.90	30.770b	< 0.001
	High school	104 (6.5)	3.70 ± 0.93
	College	323 (20.2)	4.22 ± 0.80
	Bachelor's degree or above	1,152 (72.0)	4.32 ± 0.72
Marital status	Unmarried	258 (16.1)	3.81 ± 0.72	58.937b	< 0.001
	Married	1,295 (80.9)	4.35 ± 0.75
	Divorced and others	47 (2.9)	3.96 ± 0.89
Risk evaluation management system	Have	1,167 (72.9)	4.43 ± 0.68	140.801b	< 0.001
	Don't have	139 (8.7)	3.95 ± 0.86
	Don't know	294 (18.4)	3.68 ± 0.78
Accountability system for public health emergencies	Have	1,280 (80.0)	4.41 ± 0.70	169.107b	< 0.001
	Don't have	90 (5.6)	3.96 ± 0.82
	Don't know	230 (14.4)	3.50 ± 0.73
The extent to which smart tools work	Very helpful	1,245 (77.8)	4.44 ± 0.69	214.714b	< 0.001
	Helpful	251 (15.7)	3.67 ± 0.67
	Fair	104 (6.5)	3.39 ± 0.71
Type of community you live in	Upscale community	158 (9.9)	4.29 ± 0.86	0.274b	0.761
	General community	1,008 (63.0)	4.24 ± 0.78
	Older community	434 (27.1)	4.26 ± 0.74

^at-test.

^bone-way ANOVA test.