Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 29;23(21):8808. doi: 10.3390/s23218808

Table 3.

Lidar occupancy according to each parameter (in Intersection #1).

Probability One One-Hundred-and-Twenty-Eight-Channel
Lidar (S3)
Two Forty-Channel
Lidars (S1)
Three Forty-Channel
Lidars (S2)
Crossover Mutation LO Best
Placement
LO Best
Placement
(Second Lidar)
LO Best
Placement (Third Lidar)
0.4 0.2 154,522 pld1, *
=
(−1.5,
0.3,
2.8,
−1.6,
−1.0)
138,903 pld2, *
=
(6.8,
6.0,
4.9,
−0.9,
6.0)
174,774 pld3, *
=
(6.5,
−21.1,
3.8,
12.4,
−12.4)
0.1 146,039 157,905 166,702
0.05 151,800 147,529 169,019
0.02 148,972 152,257 168,000
0.3 0.2 146,201 137,886 192,507
0.1 157,397 141,684 175,029
0.05 151,451 140,585 165,479
0.02 150,172 141,407 169,823
0.2 0.2 146,840 145,036 172,465
0.1 155,187 147,487 168,328
0.05 144,968 148,546 166,546
0.02 150,810 152,469 180,816
0.1 0.2 150,838 143,189 170,464
0.1 157,053 158,553 169,239
0.05 140,229 152,964 172,629
0.02 162,423 141,022 169,309
Mean LO 150,931 146,714 171,946
Max LO 162,423 158,553 192,507