Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 26;12(21):6775. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216775

Table 1.

Comparison of conventional semen parameters in control (n = 39) and study (n = 51) groups.

Semen Parameters N0 Control Group N1 Study Group p-Value
pH 9 7.53 ± 0.14 45 7.62 ± 0.21 0.240
Days of Abstinence 39 4.10 ± 1.33 51 3.88 ± 2.20 0.585
Semen Volume (mL) 39 2.94 ± 1.16 51 3.07 ± 1.77 0.386
Sperm Concentration (106/mL) 39 90.92 ± 50.40 51 26.78 ± 29.04 0.000
Total Sperm Count (106) 39 275.89 ± 208.42 51 81.49 ± 101.35 0.000
Total Motility (%) 39 55.62 ± 6.50 51 47.80 ± 12.25 0.000
Rapid Progressive Motility (%) 39 2.15 ± 5.22 51 7.35 ± 9.08 0.001
Slow Progressive Motility (%) 39 43.46 ± 9.69 51 20.71 ± 8.18 0.000
Non-progressive Motility (%) 39 32.67 ± 9.46 51 22.88 ± 14.24 0.000
Immotility (%) 39 21.56 ± 11.00 51 48.86 ± 14.67 0.000
Typical Morphology (%) 39 8.41 ± 3.04 51 2.82 ± 2.33 0.000
Head Abnormalities (%) 1 94 21 98.52 ± 0.75 0.000
Midpiece Abnormalities (%) 1 18 21 28.52 ± 7.80 0.202
Tail Abnormalities (%) 1 10 21 14.57 ± 9.85 0.655
Immature Forms (%) 1 0 21 6.67 ± 3.28 0.061
Viscosity (cps)
        normal 5 (12.8%) 12 (23.5%)
        abnormal 34 (87.2%) 39 (76.5%) 0.198
Liquefaction
        normal 3 (7.7%) 2 (3.9%)
        abnormal 36 (92.3%) 49 (96.1%) 0.439

Values are mean ± SD or number (column percentage). t-test independent sample or Chi-square test was used.