Table 1.
Article Identification | Trial Characteristics | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors, Year of Publication |
Citation | DOI (https://doi.org/) | Geography | CT Type | Number of True Participants |
Number of Completed Participants | Control Group | Interest Group | ||||||
Placebo or None | Number of Participants | Mean Age | SD (±) of Age | Probiotic | Number of Participants | Mean Age | SD (±) of Age | |||||||
Chen et al., 2023 | [20] | 10.1128/msystems.01300-22 | China | Two-phase, R, DB | 58 | 48 | Placebo | 29 | 46.9 | 11.25 | Probiotic | 29 | 48.7 | 11.11 |
García et al., 2023 | [21] | 10.26502/jbb.2642-91280090 | Cuba | R, DB | 64 | 57 | Placebo | 30 | 53.2 | 7.6 | Sugar shift (SS) cohort | 30 | 56.3 | 6.7 |
Hasanpour et al., 2023 | [22] | 10.1186/s12902-023-01290-w | Iran | R, DB | 100 | 92 | Soymilk + placebo | 25 | 54.24 | 6.58 | Soymilk + Probiotic | 25 | 51.16 | 7.16 |
Milk + placebo | 25 | 52.06 | 11.42 | Probiotic | 25 | 54.4 | 8.72 | |||||||
Mirjalili et al., 2023 | [23] | 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.01.014 | Iran | R, DB | 72 | 60 | Conventional yogurt | 36 | 58.1 | 9.8 | Probiotic yogurt | 36 | 54.5 | 8 |
Ahmadian et al., 2022 | [24] | 10.1186/s13098-022-00822-z | Iran | R, DB | 68 | 60 | Placebo | 30 | 61 | Range: 57 to 65 | Probiotic | 30 | 58.5 | Range: 52 to 64 |
Gupta et al., 2022 | [25] | 10.4103/jod.jod_106_21 | India | Before-and-after, NB | 308 | 308 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Participants | 308 | 54.2 | 10.9 |
Hata et al., 2022 | [26] | 10.1111/jdi.13698 | Japan | Open-label, single-arm, exploratory research | 40 | 36 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Participants | 40 | 64 | 9.4 |
Kumar et al., 2022 | [27] | N/A | India | R, DB | 150 | 150 | Metformin only | 75 | 51.1 | 5.4 | Metformin + probiotic | 75 | 50.9 | 6.2 |
Ziegler et al., 2022 | [28] | 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.04.002 | Brazil | Before-and-after, NB | 20 | 17 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Participants | 20 | 62.5 | N/A |
Aron et al., 2021 | [29] | 10.31688/ABMU.2021.56.2.09 | Romania | Patient choice, prospective 3-month comparative study, NB | 41 | 41 | Control | 22 | 58.14 | 11.17 | Study group | 19 | 60.74 | 5.84 |
Ismail et al., 2021 | [30] | 10.5603/DK.a2021.0037 | Egypt | Pilot, NB | 150 | 150 | Diet only | 50 | 46.4 | 13.2 | Yogurt and diet | 50 | 48.3 | 12.9 |
Yeast and diet | 50 | 48.6 | 11.5 | |||||||||||
Jiang et al., 2021 | [31] | 10.1002/jcla.23650 | China | R, DB, PG | 101 | 76 | Placebo | 34 | 56.12 | 8.23 | Probiotic | 42 | 55.96 | 8.45 |
Kanazawa et al., 2021 | [32] | 10.3390/nu13020558 | Japan | R, NB | 88 | 80 | Control | 42 | 55.9 | 10.7 | Synbiotic | 44 | 61.1 | 11 |
Toejing et al., 2021 | [33] | 10.3390/foods10071455 | Thailand | R, DB | 50 | 36 | Placebo | 18 | 61.8 | 7.7 | Probiotic | 18 | 63.5 | 5.9 |
Palacios et al., 2020 | [19] | 10.3390/nu12072041 | Australia | R, DB | 60 | 53 | Placebo | 30 | 56.1 | 12.3 | Probiotic | 30 | 61.4 | 8.9 |
Khalili et al., 2019 | [34] | 10.29252/.23.1.68. | Iran | R, DB, PG | 40 | NS | Placebo | 20 | 45 | 5.37 | Intervention group | 20 | 43.95 | 8.14 |
Lestari et al., 2019 | [35] | 10.2478/rjdnmd-2019-0041 | Indonesia | R, DB | 38 | 32 | Control | 19 | 53 | 10 | Intervention | 19 | 56 | 7 |
Madempudi et al., 2019 | [36] | 10.1371/journal.pone.0225168 | India | R, DB | 79 | 74 | Placebo | 39 | 50.6 | N/A | UB0316 | 40 | 54.1 | N/A |
Sabico et al., 2019 Sabico et al., 2017 |
[37,38] | 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.009 10.1186/s12967-017-1354-x. |
Saudi Arabia | R, DB | 96 | 61 | Placebo | 39 | 46.6 | 5.9 | Probiotic | 39 | 48 | 8.3 |
Hsieh et al., 2018 | [39] | 10.1038/s41598-018-35014-1 | USA | R, DB | 74 | 68 | Placebo | 24 | 55.77 | 8.55 | ADR-1 | 25 | 52.32 | 10.2 |
ADR-3 | 25 | 53.88 | 7.78 | |||||||||||
Raygan et al., 2018 | [40] | 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.02.007 | Iran | R, DB | 60 | 52 | Placebo | 30 | 67.3 | 11 | Vitamin plus probiotic group | 30 | 71.5 | 10.9 |
Feizollahzadeh et al., 2017 | [41] | 10.1007/s12602-016-9233-y | Iran | R, DB, PG | 48 | 40 | Placebo | 20 | 53.6 | 1.6 | Intervention | 20 | 56.9 | 1.81 |
Firouzi et al., 2017 | [42] | 10.1007/s00394-016-1199-8 | Malaysia | R, DB, PG | 136 | 101 | Placebo | 68 | 54.2 | 8.3 | Probiotic | 68 | 52.9 | 9.2 |
Tonucci et al., 2017 | [43] | 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.11.011 | Brazil | R, DB, PG | 50 | 45 | Placebo | 22 | 50.95 | 7.2 | Probiotic | 23 | 51.83 | 6.64 |
Sato et al., 2017 | [44] | 10.1038/s41598-017-12535-9 | Japan | R, NB | 69 | 68 | control | 34 | 65 | 8.3 | Probiotic | 34 | 64 | 9.2 |
Asemi et al., 2016 | [45] | 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.07.009 | Iran | R, DB, CO | 51 | 48 | Placebo | N/A | N/A | N/A | Beta-carotene fortified synbiotic food group | 51 | 52.9 | 8.1 |
Bahmani et al., 2016 | [46] | 10.1080/07315724.2015.1032443 | Iran | R, DB | 81 | 76 | Control bread | 27 | 53.4 | 7.5 | synbiotic bread | 27 | 51.3 | 10.4 |
Tofighiyan et al., 2016 | [47] | 10.12691/jfnr-4-12-5 | Iran | R, DB | 44 | 42 | Placebo | 22 | 54.5 | 11.1 | Probiotic | 22 | 53.45 | 10.8 |
Ogawa et al., 2014 | [48] | 10.1186/1476-511X-13-36 | Japan | SB, CO | 20 | 20 | Placebo | N/A | N/A | N/A | LG2055 treatment | 20 | 51.1 | 6.6 |
Shakeri et al., 2014 | [49] | 10.1007/s11745-014-3901-z | NS | NS | 78 | 72 | Control bread | 26 | 53.1 | 7.5 | Synbiotic bread | 26 | 52.3 | 10.8 |
Mohamadshahi et al., 2014 | [50] | PMID: 25197295 | Iran | R, DB | 44 | 44 | Conventional yogurt | 22 | 51 | NS | Probiotic yogurt | 22 | 51 | NS |
Ejtahed et al., 2012 Ejtahed et al., 2011 |
[51,52] | 10.1016/j.nut.2011.08.013 10.3168/jds.2010-4128 |
Iran | R, DB | 64 | 60 | Conventional yogurt | 30 | 51 | 7.32 | Probiotic yogurt | 30 | 50.87 | 7.68 |
Moroti et al., 2012 | [53] | 10.1186/1476-511X-11-29 | Brazil | R, DB | 50 | 18 | GP (group placebo shake) | 9 | 56.89 | 1.7 | GS (group symbiotic shake) | 9 | 55.47 | 2 |
Abbreviations: CO (crossover), DB (double blind), N/A (not applicable), NB (no blinding), NS (not specified), PG (parallel group), R (randomized), and SB (single blind).