Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 15;18(11):e0278353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278353

Table 2. Summary of main study characteristics.

Author and publication year Study design Country Setting Participants (eligibility criteria) Sample size (n) Study period Community care intervention
1 David et al.
2022 [37]
Mixed method South Africa Urban  • Existing diagnosis of T2DM
 • Prescribed metformin and/or glimepiride
 • 331 in community model
 • 130 in facility model
16 months Home delivery of medication:
 • CHW delivery of pre-packaged medication
 • Assessment of symptoms of COVID-19
 • Assessment of other complaints
 • Needs-based referral to primary health facility.
2 Pastakia et al. 2017 [38] Prospective cohort with historic control group Kenya Rural For screening: all consenting individuals.
For cohort: all diagnosed with T2DM
876 screened, 10 with T2DM 6 to 12 months BIGPIC:
 • Community screening,
 • Linkage to peer/microfinance group.
 • monthly microfinance meetings
 • T2DM treatment in community
3 Takenga et al. 2014 [39] Randomized pilot trial Democratic Republic of Congo Urban T2DM patients between the age of 35 to 75 40 (20 in intervention arm) Not reported Mobil Diab System:
 • eHealth solution available as mobile app or web-based.
 • Enables self-monitoring of blood glucose by patients.
 • Remote follow-up by care providers.
 • Telephone support
4 Ndou et al. 2013 [21] Retrospective cohort study with matched control group South Africa Urban Stable patients with diabetes. 56 community model (22 with T2DM); 168 facility care (42 with T2DM) Not reported Kgatelopele programme:
 • Monthly packaging of medications by pharmacist.
 •Monthly home visits, where CHW brings the medication to the patient’s home.
 •6-monthly clinic visits by patients to be examined by physician.

BIGPIC = Impact of Bridging Income Generation with Group Integrated Care; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; CHW = community health workers