Skip to main content
. 2005 Mar;71(3):1480–1494. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.3.1480-1494.2005

TABLE 1.

Overview of the spore load at the dairy farmsa

Sample (no. of isolates) % TS content
Avg concn
≤10 >10-≤102 >102-≤103 >103-≤104 >104-≤105 >105-≤106 >106-≤107
Raw milk (CFU ml−1)
    Total (18) 5.6 33.3 38.9 16.7 5.6 5.46 × 103
Milking machine (CFU swab−1)
    Teat cups (33) 21.2 54.5 21.2 3.0 3.84 × 102
    Cluster (12) 16.7 50.0 16.7 16.7 1.05 × 103
    Connection point pipeline (6) 33.3 50.0 16.7 8.89 × 103
    Filter cloth (2)b 50.0 50.0 1.19 × 104
    Collection tank (11) 18.2 18.2 45.5 18.2 5.18 × 102
    Total (64) 17.2 43.8 26.6 9.4 3.1
Green crop (CFU g−1)
    Ensilage (12) 8.3 25.0 50.0 16.7 1.44 × 105
    Green maize (15) 6.7 26.7 33.3 20.0 6.7 6.7 2.86 × 105
    Hay/straw (5) 40.0 40.0 20.0 1.01 × 105
    Other (4)c 50.0 50.0 1.31 × 104
    Total (36) 2.8 13.9 33.3 36.1 11.1 2.8
Fodder (CFU g−1)
    Feed concentrate (25) 4.0 20.0 40.0 16.0 20.0 8.3 × 105
    Pulp (2) 50.0 50.0 2.1 × 104
    Other (5)d 40.0 40.0 20.0 1.0 × 104
    Total (32) 3.1 6.3 25.0 37.5 12.5 15.6
a

Total spore counts are expressed as percentages of the samples belonging to a given spore content category after heating at 80°C for 10 min. The number of samples analyzed per category of sample is mentioned in parentheses.

b

The whole filter cloth was recovered for sampling; therefore, concentration is expressed as CFU per gram for this sample category.

c

Other samples included luceme, chopped corn, grass, and ensiled beetroot and leaves.

d

Other samples included soy (2), soy mixed with linseed, cereals, and a mixture of wheat, barley, and linseed.