Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 29;1(1):9–17. doi: 10.31547/bct-2018-001

Table 2.

Reported outcomes for SAA patients who received URD-SCT

Study Study design N Age, median
(range), yr
Conditioning
regimen
Graft
failure, %
Acute
GVHD, %
Chronic
GVHD, %
OS, %
Kojima et al. (2002)67 Registry-based 154 17 (1-46) TBI+Cy±ATG
LFI+Cy±ATG
11 29 30 56 at 5 yr
Bacigalupo et al. (2005)23 Registry-based 38 14 (3-37) Flu+Cy+ATG 18 11 27 73 at 2 yr
Deeg et al. (2006)20 Prospective 87 19 (1-53) Cy+TBI±ATG
(TBI; dose de-escalation)
5 NA 43 55 at 7 yr
Bacigalupo et al. (2010)19 Registry-based 52 13 (3-51) Flu+Cy+ATG 17 17 23 73 at 5 yr
48 27 (7-53) Flu+Cy+ATG+TBI 17 19 38 79 at 5 yr
Lee et al. (2011)27 Retrospective 50 28 (15-53) Cy+TBI 2 46 50 at 5 yr 88 at 5 yr
Anderlini et al. (2015)24 Prospective 38 24.5 (0.5-65.9) Flu+Cy (50 mg/kg) +ATG+TBI 8 24 23 at 1 yr 97 at 1 yr
41 17.6 (1.9-63.3) Flu+Cy (100 mg/kg) +ATG+TBI 15 27 32 at 1yr 81 at 1 yr
Park et al. (2017)30 Retrospective 83 30 (17-59) Cy+TBI±ATG
Group 1§
Group 2A§
Group 2B§
0
1
0
44
62
31
44 at 3 yr
65 at 3 yr
22 at 3 yr
84 at 5 yr
92 at 5 yr
88 at 5 yr

GVHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; OS, overall survival; EBMT, European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation; Flu, fludarabine; Cy, cyclophosphamide; ATG, anti-thymocyte globulin; TBI, total body irradiation; LFI, limited field irradiation.

Primary and secondary graft failure

Acute GVHD≥grade 2

38 SAA patients who underwent SCT from unrelated (n = 33) or family mismatched (n = 5) donors were enrolled.

§The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 25) received HLA-matched (8/8) bone marrow (BM) without ATG; group 2 (n = 58) received SCT from either an HLA-mismatched donor or peripheral blood (PB). Thereafter, group 2 was subdivided according to ATG use into group 2A (without ATG, n = 26), which served as a historical cohort, and group 2B (with ATG, n = 32).