Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 6;7(11):1350–1373. doi: 10.1038/s41551-023-01061-x

Fig. 2. PHM alleviates the sensitivity of the RVLM of SHRSPs to angiotensin II or valsartan.

Fig. 2

a, Schematic of the experimental protocol to analyse the effects of PHM on the sensitivity to angiotensin II (ang. II) or valsartan injected into the unilateral RVLM. Angiotensin II (100 pmol) was injected into the unilateral RVLM of WKY rats and SHRSPs that were either left sedentary (daily anaesthesia) or treated with PHM (30 min per day, 28 days), with their blood pressure monitored under urethane anaesthesia. Injection of valsartan (100 pmol) into the RVLM was conducted at least 2 h after the injection of angiotensin II. b, Representative trajectories of blood pressure (top) and MAP (bottom). The arrows point to the time of the initiation of RVLM injection of angiotensin II. c, Quantification of the change in MAP caused by injection of angiotensin II (P = 0.9876 (column 1 versus 2), P = 0.0003 (column 3 versus 4)). n = 5 (each group of WKY), n = 7 (SHRSP, −PHM) and n = 8 (SHRSP, +PHM) rats. d,e, The effects of injection of valsartan (100 pmol) in the RVLM were examined as described in b and c (the change in blood pressure and MAP (d) and the MAP trajectory (e)) (P = 0.9953 (column 1 versus 2), P = 0.0099 (column 3 versus 4) (e)). n = 3 (WKY, −PHM), n = 5 (WKY, +PHM) and n = 4 (each group of SHRSPs) rats. Data are mean ± s.e.m. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc multiple-comparison test; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. For b and d, scale bars, 1 min (horizontal) and 50 mm Hg (vertical).

Source data