Table 1.
Themes, Descriptions, and Potential Health System Intervention Components
| Theme | Description | Potential intervention components |
|---|---|---|
| Belief about the negative consequences (emotional and material) of not passing test | Concerns about not passing the test, such as feeling guilty about overusing language skills; worry that not passing would threaten personal or professional identity; uncertainty about consequences of not passing the exam, such as loss of privileges or opportunity to retake the test. |
• Messaging incorporating champions and addressing the emotional barriers to assessment and the potential perceived threats to personal or professional identity • Transparency about assessment format, structure, and scoring, as well as opportunities for retaking the assessment • Resources to support improvement to reach passing threshold |
| Time constraints and competing demands | Prioritization of time and competing priorities as barriers to proficiency testing. |
• Schedule time for new hires and existing employees to take assessment • Incorporate assessment into clinical schedule • Create and communicate clear policy for certification |
| Challenging test format and structure | Test not representative of a patient-clinician conversation; test register and difficulty too high; uniform content not applicable; dislike of testing in general. |
• Informational materials about assessment format, structure, and scoring • Consider alternative assessment options such as validated approaches to direct observation • Recruit champions and opinion leaders to reinforce importance of assessment |
| Messaging consistent with professional ethos | Recommendations to appeal to clinicians’ professional identity or role, emphasizing patient-centered care, rather than punitive messaging. | • Messaging campaigns to encourage certification, emphasizing quality patient care |
| Organizational culture that values and incentivizes certification | Need for recognition, financial incentives, or support and resources; a clear mandate or policy for certification. |
• Financial incentives and rewards to get certified and to see patients in non-English language once certified • Assessment guidelines for new bilingual hires and existing employees, with standardized procedures • Dashboard of clinicians’ non-English skills and certification which is made available to patients and employees • Visible recognition for certified bilingual clinicians, for example, an ID sticker, listing on a website |
| Reassurance and empowerment about personal language proficiency | Passing the test could serve as reassurance not to use an interpreter in clinical encounters or for a clinical supervisor to trust a trainee’s language skills; not passing the test could serve as reassurance to use an interpreter; reassurance that it is ok to use an interpreter when clinician feels one is needed, even after passing the test. |
• Training sessions and guidance on appropriate use of interpreters • Messaging campaigns to encourage certification, emphasizing quality patient care • Guidance on accessing professional interpreters, regardless of certification status • Educational sessions about certification and ensuring language access |
| Individuals championing certification | Messaging from trusted individuals. |
• Recruit champions and opinion leaders to reinforce importance of assessment • Messaging campaigns to encourage certification, emphasizing quality patient care |