Table 2. Statistical Experimental Design Generated from RSM.
| factor 1 | factor 2 | factor 3 | responses |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| std | run | A: catalyst conc. (ppm) | B: p-NP conc. (ppm) | C: pH | observed conversion efficiency (%) | predicted conversion efficiency (%) |
| 7 | 1 | 150 | 200 | 8 | 78 | 76.8 |
| 9 | 2 | 100 | 150 | 7 | 62 | 61.9 |
| 11 | 3 | 200 | 50 | 7 | 80 | 80.4 |
| 16 | 4 | 200 | 150 | 7 | 98 | 97.2 |
| 10 | 5 | 300 | 150 | 7 | 45 | 45.4 |
| 14 | 6 | 200 | 150 | 9 | 90 | 90.8 |
| 2 | 7 | 250 | 100 | 6 | 82 | 82.6 |
| 3 | 8 | 150 | 200 | 6 | 85 | 86.1 |
| 18 | 9 | 200 | 150 | 7 | 98 | 99.1 |
| 6 | 10 | 250 | 100 | 8 | 84 | 83.1 |
| 5 | 11 | 150 | 100 | 8 | 74 | 75.2 |
| 20 | 12 | 200 | 150 | 7 | 98 | 98.5 |
| 13 | 13 | 200 | 150 | 5 | 85 | 85.2 |
| 17 | 14 | 200 | 150 | 7 | 98 | 98.2 |
| 1 | 15 | 150 | 100 | 6 | 80 | 80.7 |
| 8 | 16 | 250 | 200 | 8 | 70 | 68.4 |
| 12 | 17 | 200 | 250 | 7 | 68 | 69.4 |
| 19 | 18 | 200 | 150 | 7 | 98 | 98.4 |
| 4 | 19 | 250 | 200 | 6 | 65 | 66.4 |
| 15 | 20 | 200 | 150 | 7 | 98 | 97.4 |