Table 1. Steady-State OECT Performance Summary for iOECTs and pOECTs.
polymer | gm,iOECT [mS]a | gm,pOECT [S cm–1]b,c | μC* [F cm–1 V–1 s–1]d | C* [F cm–3]e | μOECT [cm2 V–1 s–1]f | ON/OFFpOECTc | ON/OFFiOECTa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P3C(Pr)T | 158 ± 5 | 35 ± 9 | 83 ± 3 | 145 18 | 0.57 ± 0.06 | 3.7 × 105 | 2.2 × 104 |
P3C(Bu)T | 159 ± 0.5 | 47 ± 16 | 107 ± 4 | 111 ± 14 | 0.96 ± 0.08 | 5.3 × 104 | 9.5 × 103 |
P3C(Pe)T | 149 ± 2 | 16 ± 5 | 38 ± 3 | 30 ± 5 | 1.26 ± 0.2 | 2.6 × 104 | 6.6 × 103 |
Average values calculated across at least three iOECT devices.
Normalized transconductance gm,pOECT is calculated according to .
Average values were calculated from at least ten operational channels.
μC* is extracted by linear approximation of transconductance gm versus channel geometry , as shown in Figure S14.
Extracted from the electrochemical impedance spectra.
Mobility values μ are calculated from the μC* and the volumetric capacitance C*.