TABLE 3.
Effect of primer degeneracies on PCR product ratiosa
| Prepn | Eco(GC)/Eco(AT)m ratiob
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 cycles | 25 cycles | 35 cycles | |
| Template mixture | 1.0 ± 0.04 | 1.0 ± 0.04 | 1.0 ± 0.04 |
| PCR 1 | 1.4 ± 0.16 | 1.5 ± 0.06 | 2.3 ± 0.10 |
| PCR 2 | 1.4 ± 0.14 | 1.8 ± 0.11 | 2.3 ± 0.07 |
| PCR 3 | 1.3 ± 0.11 | 1.7 ± 0.07 | 2.5 ± 0.20 |
| PCR 4 | 1.4 ± 0.26 | 1.9 ± 0.07 | 1.9 ± 0.14 |
| PCR 5 | 1.3 ± 0.16 | 1.8 ± 0.09 | 2.0 ± 0.17 |
The data were generated by dot blot hybridization by using the template-specific probes Eco and EcoM and mixtures containing equal amounts of templates Eco(GC) and Eco(AT)m. PCR products were amplified from the same template mixtures for 15, 25, and 35 cycles.
Means ± standard deviations were calculated from data for three replicate dots for each of the samples which was hybridized with the specific probes and quantified by phosphorimaging.