Skip to main content
. 1998 Oct;64(10):3724–3730. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.10.3724-3730.1998

TABLE 3.

Effect of primer degeneracies on PCR product ratiosa

Prepn Eco(GC)/Eco(AT)m ratiob
15 cycles 25 cycles 35 cycles
Template mixture 1.0 ± 0.04 1.0 ± 0.04 1.0 ± 0.04
PCR 1 1.4 ± 0.16 1.5 ± 0.06 2.3 ± 0.10
PCR 2 1.4 ± 0.14 1.8 ± 0.11 2.3 ± 0.07
PCR 3 1.3 ± 0.11 1.7 ± 0.07 2.5 ± 0.20
PCR 4 1.4 ± 0.26 1.9 ± 0.07 1.9 ± 0.14
PCR 5 1.3 ± 0.16 1.8 ± 0.09 2.0 ± 0.17
a

The data were generated by dot blot hybridization by using the template-specific probes Eco and EcoM and mixtures containing equal amounts of templates Eco(GC) and Eco(AT)m. PCR products were amplified from the same template mixtures for 15, 25, and 35 cycles. 

b

Means ± standard deviations were calculated from data for three replicate dots for each of the samples which was hybridized with the specific probes and quantified by phosphorimaging.