Table 3.

The mediation effect of the coping strategies on Internet addiction via student school burnout (N_male = 59)

Independent variable: Active coping strategies			F	∆R2	β	p
Direct effects	Active coping strategy – Internet addiction		4.32*	.05	–.27	.042
	Student school burnout – Internet addiction		20.91***	.27	–.52	< .001
	Active coping strategy and Student school burnout – Internet addiction		11.33***	.26	ACOPE –.48	.219
					SSBS –.15	< .001
Independent variable: Helplessness			F	∆R2	β	p
Direct effects		Helplessness – Internet addiction	12.73***	.18	.43	.001
		Helplessness – Student school burnout	8.51	.12	–.36	.005
		Student school burnout – Internet addiction	20.91***	.26	–.52	< .001
		Helplessness and Student school burnout – Internet addiction	14.10***	.31	HLCOPE .28	.021
					SSBS –.42	.001
Indirect effect		Helplessness – Student school burnout – Internet addiction	Effect .15	SE. 07		95% CI [.03, .31]
Independent variable: Avoidance behavior coping strategies			F	∆R2	β	p
Direct effects		Avoidance behavior coping strategies – Internet addiction	11.78***	.16	.41	.001
		Avoidance behavior coping strategies – Student school burnout	7.80**	.11	–.35	.007
		Student school burnout – Internet addiction	20.91***	.26	–.52	< .001
		Avoidance behavior coping strategies and Student school burnout – Internet addiction	13.83***	.31	ABCOPE .27	.026
					SSBS –.43	.001
Indirect effect		Avoidance behavior coping strategies – Student school burnout – Internet addiction	Effect .15	SE. 08		95% CI [.03, .31]

Note. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001. SSBS – Secondary School Burnout Scale; ACOPE – active coping strategy; HLCOPE – helplessness; ABCOPE – avoidance behavior coping strategies.