Table II.
Transgenic complementation of crc-1
| Genotypea
|
PROCRC Transgeneb
|
Presence of Nectariesc
|
Apical Fusion of Pistild
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | ± | − | + | ± | − | ||
| Wild type | 20 | –e | – | 10 | – | – | |
| crc-1 ET668 | – | – | 20 | – | – | 10 | |
| CRC | 19 | – | 1 | 10 | – | – | |
| INO | – | – | 20 | – | – | 10 | |
| CiII | 2 | 3 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 2 | |
| IcCC | 12 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 1 | |
| IcCI | 4 | 4 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
| CiIC | 16 | 1 | 3 | 10 | – | – | |
| IiIC | 1 | – | 19 | – | – | 10 | |
| CcCI | 12 | 3 | 5 | 9 | – | 1 | |
a
Genotype of plants examined in this study; all transgenics were genotypically crc-1 ET668.
b
Respective coding regions were expressed using PROCRC.
c
Presence of nectary tissue was determined by detectable GUS activity of the ET668 enhancer trap.
d
Fusion of the gynoecium apex was determined by light microscopy.
e
–, No plants of this class observed.