Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 15;24(1):2274121. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2023.2274121

Table 3.

Related-references about IC plus CCRT in LA-NPC.

Author Year Study design Patients Groups Result median follow-up IC regime
Sun 20167 Prospective3 stage III-IVB (except T3-4N0) IC+CCRT vs CCRT 3-year FFS 80% vs 72%,p = .034 45months TPF
Frikha 201821 Prospective3 stage III-IVB
(except T3-4N0)
IC+CCRT vs CCRT 3-year PFS 73.9% vs 57.2%, P = .042
3-years OS 86.3% vs 68.9% P = .05
43.1months TPF
Hong 201822 Prospective3 stage IVA-IVB IC+CCRT vs CCRT 5-year DFS 61% vs 50%, P = .0264 72months MEPFL
Li 201917 Prospective3 stage III-IVB
(except T3-4N0)
IC+CCRT vs CCRT 5-year FFS 77.4% vs. 66.4%, p = .019
5-yearOS 85.6% vs. 77.7%, p = .042
5-year DFFS 88% vs. 79.8%, p = .030
5-yearLFFS 90.7% vs. 83.8%, p = .044
71.5 months TPF
Yang 201923 Prospective3 stage III-IVB
(except T3N0–1)
IC+CCRT vs CCRT 5-year DFS 73.4% vs 63.1%, p = .007
5-year DMFS 82.8% vs 73.1%, p = .014
5-year OS 80.8% vs 76.8%, p = .040
82.6 months PF
Zhang 202224 Prospective3 stage III-IVB
(except T3-4N0)
IC+CCRT vs CCRT 5-year OS 87.9% vs 78.8%, P = .001 69.8months GP