Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 24;10(6):1535–1554. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00595-5

Table 4.

Dose–response relationships between the dosages of MMF use and risks of infections in patients with SLE

Variable Patients with infection, n (%)
(n = 1577)
Patients without infection, n (%)
(n = 1762)
OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Overall infection
 Non-use 1323 (44.7) 1640 (55.3) 1.00 1.00
  < 1 g/day 69 (67.0) 34 (33.0) 2.52 (1.66, 3.82) 2.03 (1.31, 3.16)
  ≥ 1 g/day 185 (67.8) 88 (32.2) 2.61 (2.00, 3.39) 1.85 (1.39, 2.46)
 P for trend  < 0.001  < 0.001
MMF dose (continuous, g/day) 1.90 (1.60, 2.27) 1.48 (1.23, 1.79)
Bacterial infection
 Non-use 765 (31.8) 1640 (68.2) 1.00 1.00
  < 1 g/day 34 (47.2) 38 (52.8) 2.40 (1.50, 3.84) 2.20 (1.32, 3.67)
  ≥ 1 g/day 88 (44.7) 109 (55.3) 2.66 (1.98, 3.56) 2.02 (1.45, 2.80)
 P for trend  < 0.001  < 0.001
MMF dose (continuous, g/d) 1.89 (1.56, 2.29) 1.58 (1.27, 1.95)
Virus infection
 Non-use 207 (11.2) 1640 (88.8) 1.00 1.00
  < 1 g/day 10 (22.7) 34 (77.3) 2.33 (1.14, 4.79) 2.12 (0.98, 4.58)
  ≥ 1 g/day 26 (22.8) 88 (77.2) 2.34 (1.48, 3.71) 1.85 (1.10, 3.10)
 P for trend  < 0.001 0.008
MMF dose (continuous, g/day) 1.73 (1.30, 2.31) 1.54 (1.11, 2.13)
Opportunistic infection
 Non-use 132 (7.4) 1640 (92.6) 1.00 1.00
 < 1 g/day 12 (26.1) 34 (73.9) 4.39 (2.22, 8.67) 3.21 (1.55, 6.67)
  ≥ 1 g/day 19 (17.8) 88 (82.2) 2.68 (1.58, 4.54) 1.73 (0.96, 3.09)
 P for trend  < 0.001 0.014
MMF dose (continuous, g/day) 1.91 (1.37, 2.65) 1.46 (1.00, 2.12)

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval. Multivariable analysis models were adjusted for sex (female = 1, male = 0), age (continuous), SLE disease period years (continuous), SLEDAI score on admission (continuous), hypertension (yes = 1, no = 0), diabetes mellitus (yes = 1, no = 0), mean daily prednisone equivalent dose (continuous), CYC treatment (yes = 1, no = 0), TAC treatment (yes = 1, no = 0), and other immunosuppressants (yes = 1, no = 0)