Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 17;19(9):746–756. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00456

Table 1. Frequency of PPM according to the method of the definition of PPM.

All patients (N=2,463) Patients with BMI <30 kg/m2 (N=1,902) Patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (N=561) p-value
Measured PPM
Measured EOAi, cm2/m2 0.95±0.29 0.98±0.29 0.82±0.24 <0.001
Moderate or severe measured PPM 879 (35.7) 699 (36.8) 180 (32.1) 0.045
Moderate measured PPM 664 (27.0) 534 (28.1) 130 (23.2) 0.023
Severe measured PPM 215 (8.7) 165 (8.7) 50 (8.9) 0.865
Predicted PPMTHV
Predicted EOAiTHV, cm2/m2 0.96±0.15 0.99±0.15 0.84±0.11 <0.001
Moderate or severe predicted PPMTHV 308 (12.5) 262 (13.8) 46 (8.2) <0.001
Moderate predicted PPMTHV 279 (11.3) 235 (12.4) 44 (7.8) 0.003
Severe predicted PPMTHV 29 (1.2) 27 (1.4) 2 (0.4) 0.043
Predicted PPMCT N=1,570 N=1,220 N=350
Predicted EOAiCT, cm2/m2 0.97±0.15 1.0±0.15 0.84±0.11 <0.001
Moderate or severe predicted PPMCT 190 (12.1) 160 (13.1) 30 (8.6) 0.020
Moderate predicted PPMCT 189 (12.0) 159 (13.0) 30 (8.6) 0.025
Severe predicted PPMCT 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 1.000
Values are mean±standard deviation or n (%). BMI: body mass index; EOAi: effective orifice area indexed to body surface area; EOAiCT: predicted EOA based on the normal reference values of EOA derived from aortic annulus dimensions measured by preprocedural computed tomography; EOATHV: predicted EOA based on the normal reference val­ues of EOA for each size and type of implanted transcatheter heart valve; PPM: prosthesis-patient mismatch; PPMCT: PPM defined by predicted EOA derived from preprocedural computed tomography; PPMTHV: PPM defined by predicted EOA for each size and model of implanted transcatheter heart valve