Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 10;9(4):281–288. doi: 10.5114/cipp.2021.104801

Table 2.

Hierarchical multiple regression analysis predicting satisfaction with life (SWLS) – model 1: four predictors

Predictor variable ΔR2 AIC BIC B [95% CI] β t p
Step 1 .21*** 8.12 18.21
Constant 2.68 [1.83, 3.53]
Positive affect 0.64 [0.43, 0.85] .38 5.93 < .001
Negative affect −0.25 [−0.42, −0.08] −.18 −2.86 .005
Step 2 .02* 5.50 18.95
Constant 3.54 [2.38, 4.69]
Positive affect 0.51 [0.26, 0.75] .30 4.07 < .001
Negative affect −0.18 [−0.36, 0.01] −.13 −1.95 .053
Dysthymia −0.33 [−0.63, −0.03] −.17 −2.14 .033
Step 3 .04*** −4.08 12.73
Constant 1.82 [0.31, 3.32]
Positive affect 0.38 [0.13, 0.63] .22 2.97 .003
Negative affect −0.10 [−0.28, 0.09] −.07 −1.02 .309
Dysthymia −0.09 [−0.42, 0.23] −.05 −0.56 .573
Euthymia 0.54 [0.23, 0.85] .29 3.41 .001
Total R2 .25***

Note. AIC – Akaike information criterion, BIC – Bayesian information criterion; *p < .05; ***p < .001.