Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Think Reason. 2022 Nov 25;29(4):760–784. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2022.2146191

Table 2.

Correlations between the percent of CRA problems solved via insight and step-by-step analysis, percent of CRT problems, and Bullshit Receptivity Score and Overclaiming Accuracy.

Correlations

Percent of CRAs solved CRAs solved via insight CRAs solved step-by-step CRT % Correct Bullshit Receptivity Score

Bullshit Receptivity Score Pearson’s r −0.085 −0.346 ** 0.273 * −0.263 *
p-value 0.515 0.006 0.033 0.041
Upper 95% CI 0.170 −0.103 0.491 −0.012
Lower 95% CI −0.330 −0.550 0.023 −0.483
Overclaiming Accuracy Pearson’s r 0.476 *** 0.351 ** 0.229 0.305 ** −0.334 **
p-value < .001 0.006 0.076 0.017 0.008
Upper 95% CI 0.650 0.554 0.455 0.517 −0.090
Lower 95% CI 0.255 0.109 −0.024 0.058 −0.541

The bold values indicate significant results with statistical thresholds of *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001 respectively.