Table 1.
Characteristics of studies and main outcomes.
| +First Author/Year of publication | Type of study | Intervention | Number of patients | Time of assessement | Complete Clearance in %(Unless indicated otherwise) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dirschka et al, 2013 | Two prospective randomized controlledphase III trials | MAL-PDT versus BF-200 ALA | 482 | 6 and 12 months | MAL-PDT: 36% and BF-200 ALA: 47% |
| Serra-Guillén et al, 2018 | Randomized intraindividual comparative | MAL-PDT versus BF-200 ALA | 25 | 1 month | MAL-PDT: 56% and BF-200 ALA: 62% |
| Neittaanmäki Perttu et al, 2014 | Randomized double-blinded non-sponsored prospective | MAL-PDT versus BF-200 ALA | 13 | 3 months | MALPDT: 74.2% and BF-200 ALA: 84.5% |
| Dirschka et al, 2018 | Randomized intra-individual non-inferiorityphase III | DL-MAL-PDT versus BF-200 ALA DL-PDT |
52 | 12 weeks | BF-200 ALA DL-PDT: 79.8% and MAL-DL-PDT: 76.5% |
| Reinhold et al, 2016 | Randomized, double-blind, phase III, multicentre | BF-200 ALA combined with the BF-RhodoLED versus placebo | 55 patients received BF-200 ALA, 32 received placebo | 3 months with a potential of an additional PDT session | BF-200 ALA: 91% and placebo: 22% |
| Räsänen et al, 2019 | Non-sponsored, prospective randomized double-blind multicentre | BF-200 ALA versus MAL in DL-PDT | 69 | 12 months | BF-200 ALA DL-PDT: 79.7% and MAL DL-PDT: 73.5% |
| Moloney et al, 2007 | Randomized, double-blind, prospective | MAL-PDT versus ALA-PDT | 15 | 1 month | Mean reduction from baseline in AK counts with ALA-PDT: 6.2 +/− 1.9 and MAL-PDT: 5.6 +/− 3.2 |
| Apalla et al, 2010 | Randomized placebo-controlled | ALA-PDT versus placebo | 39 | 12 months | ALA-PDT: 64% and placebo: 26% |
| Kleinpenning et al, 2010 | Comparative to baseline | MAL-PDT | 14 | 3 months | 42.9% |
| Arisi et al, 2020 | Randomized, cohort | MAL-PDT, ingenol mebutate gel and diclofenac plus hyaluronate gel | 90 patients, 30 in each cohort | 90 days | MAL-PDT: 23.07%, ingenol mebutate: 30% and diclofenac plus hyaluronate: 14.28% |
| Sotiriou et al, 2015 | Randomized intraindividual comparison | MAL-PDT versus. Imiquimod 5% | 44 | 12 months | No statistically significant difference between the two mirrored fields regarding the development of new lesions. |
| Jansen et al, 2019 | Randomized, multicenter | 5% fluorouracil, 5% imiquimod, MAL-PDT, or 0.015% ingenol mebutate | 624 | 12 months | Fluorouracil: 74.7%, imiquimod:53.9%; MAL-PDT: 37.7% and ingenol mebutate: 28.9% |
| Karrer et al, 2019 | Open, interventional, multicenter | MAL DL-PDT | 50 | 3 months | 62% |
| Assikar et al, 2020 | Controlled randomized intra-individual | DL-PDT versus PDT | 26 | 3 and 6 months | 3 months: DL-PDT: 90.5% and PDT: 94.2%; 6 months: DL-PDT:90.0% and PDT: 94.6% |
| Sotiriou et al, 2017 | Randomized intra-individual comparative | DL-PDT versus PDT | 23 | 12 months | DL-PDT: 78% and PDT: 80.6% |
| Lacour et al, 2005 | Randomised investigator-blinded controlled phase III | DL-PDT and PDT | 108 | 12 weeks | DL-PDT: 74% and PDT: 70% |
| Genovese et al, 2016 | Intraindividual comparative | DL-PDT versus ingenol mebutate | 27 | 3 months | DL-PDT: 72.4% and ingenol mebutate: 73.6% |
| Wiegell et al, 2012 | Randomized multicenter | MAL DL-PDT | 145 | 3 months | Grade I AKs: 75.9%, grade II: 61.2% and grade III: 49.1% |
| Ulrich et al, 2021 | Vehicle-controlled phase III | BF-200 ALA-PDT versus vehicle | 50 | 12 months | BF-200 ALA-PDT: 86.0% and vehicle: 32.9% |
| Salido-Vallejo et al, 2020 | Single-centre, intraindividual, retrospective | BF-200 ALA-PDT and DL-PDT(combPDT) versus DL-PDT | 19 | 12 weeks | combPDT: 31.6% and DL-PDT: 15.8% |
| Gracia-Cazaña et al, 2019 | Observational, prospective, comparative | DL-PDT versus DL-PDT plus ingenol mebutate | 43 | 12 months | DL-PDT: 75.2% and DL-PDT plus ingenol mebutate: 54.6% |
| Petukhova et al, 2017 | Randomized, single-blinded, split-face controlled, 2-arm clinical trial. | 10- or 20-minute ALA incubation times, after pretreatment with a microneedle or sham roller | 32 | 1 month | 20-minute incubation arm: microneedle: 76% and sham roller: 58%; 10-minute incubation arm: microneedle: 43% and sham roller: 38% |
| Torezan et al, 2013 | Pilot split-face comparative | Microneedling-PDT versus MAL-PDT | 10 | 1 and 3 months | At day 90, facial erythema (p = .04) and coarse wrinkles (p = .002) improved on the microneedling-PDT side, compared to MAL-PDT (p = .01). |
| Torezan et al, 2018 | Randomized split-scalp comparative | Calcipotriol-MAL-PDT versus. MAL-PDT | 20 | 3 months | Calcipotriol-MAL-PDT: 92.1% and MAL-PDT: 82.0% |
| Bullock et al, 2022 | Interventional cohort-controlled | Oral vitamin D3 combined with PDT versus MAL-PDT | 29 patients in each group | 3 to 6 months | Oral vitamin D3 combined with PDT: 72.5% and MAL-PDT: 54.4% |
| Maytin et al, 2018 | Bilaterally controlled | PDT plus topical 5-fluorouracil versus PDT | 17 | 3, 6, 9, and 12 months | PDT plus topical 5-fluorouracil: 75% and PDT: 45% at 3 months; PDT plus topical 5-fluorouracil: 67% and PDT: 39% at 6 months |
| Pires et al, 2019 | Intra-individual comparative | Acoustic pressure wave ultrasound-CO2-MAL-PDT versus MAL-PDT | 15 | 6 months | Acoustic pressure wave ultrasound-CO2-MAL-PDT: 72% and MAL-PDT: 65% |
| Vrani et al, 2019 | Randomized intraindividual comparison | Fractional CO2 laser-PDT versus PDT | 42 | 12 months | Fractional laser-PDT: 47.2% and PDT: 52.3% |
| Togsverd-Bo et al, 2012 | Randomized comparative | Fractional CO2 laser-PDT versus PDT | 15 | 3 months | Fractional laser-PDT: 88% and PDT: 59% |
| Bento et al, 2021 | Randomized controlled four-arm comparative | DL-PDT; DL-PDT + microneedles; DL-PDT + CO2 laser; DL-PDT +microdermabrasion | 40 patients, 10 patients at each group | 3 and 6 months | The DL-PDT+ microneedles group had a higher AK-clearance after 1 (p=0,002) and 3 (p=0,034) months. Similar in every group at 6 months (p=0,441) |
| Togsverd-Bo et al, 2015 | Randomized controlled | Ablative fractional laser (AFL)-assisted DL-PDT) (AFL-dPDT) versus DL-PDT), PDT and AFL alone (AFL) | 16 | 3 months | AFL-dPDT: 74%, DL-PDT: 46%, PDT: 50% and AFL: 5% |
| Togsverd-Bo et al, 2015 | Randomized intra-individual controlled | Repeated PDT every 6 months for AK prevention | 25 | 3 years | New AKs in 63% of patients in untreated skin areas versus 28% of patients in PDT-treated skin |
| Piacquadio et al, 2020 | Randomized, parallel-group, evaluator-blinded | ALA 2× versus ALA 3× versus vehicle PDT | 166 | 52 weeks | ALA 2x: 36.0%, ALA 3x: 37.5%, vehicle: 18.9% |
ALA = 5-aminolevulinic acid; BF200-ALA = Nanoscale-lipid vesicle formulation with the prodrug 5-aminolevulinic acid;
PDT = photodynamic therapy;
AFXL-PDT = ablative fractional laser resurfacing photodynamic therapy;
DL = daylight photodynamic therapy;
MAL-PDT = methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy.