Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 1;13(4):e2023291. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1304a291

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies and main outcomes.

+First Author/Year of publication Type of study Intervention Number of patients Time of assessement Complete Clearance in %(Unless indicated otherwise)
Dirschka et al, 2013 Two prospective randomized controlledphase III trials MAL-PDT versus BF-200 ALA 482 6 and 12 months MAL-PDT: 36% and BF-200
ALA: 47%
Serra-Guillén et al, 2018 Randomized intraindividual comparative MAL-PDT versus BF-200 ALA 25 1 month MAL-PDT:
56% and BF-200 ALA: 62%
Neittaanmäki Perttu et al, 2014 Randomized double-blinded non-sponsored prospective MAL-PDT versus BF-200 ALA 13 3 months MALPDT: 74.2% and BF-200 ALA: 84.5%
Dirschka et al, 2018 Randomized intra-individual non-inferiorityphase III DL-MAL-PDT versus BF-200
ALA DL-PDT
52 12 weeks BF-200 ALA DL-PDT: 79.8% and MAL-DL-PDT: 76.5%
Reinhold et al, 2016 Randomized, double-blind, phase III, multicentre BF-200 ALA combined with the BF-RhodoLED versus placebo 55 patients received BF-200 ALA, 32 received placebo 3 months with a potential of an additional PDT session BF-200 ALA: 91% and placebo: 22%
Räsänen et al, 2019 Non-sponsored, prospective randomized double-blind multicentre BF-200 ALA versus MAL in DL-PDT 69 12 months BF-200 ALA DL-PDT: 79.7% and MAL DL-PDT: 73.5%
Moloney et al, 2007 Randomized, double-blind, prospective MAL-PDT versus ALA-PDT 15 1 month Mean reduction from baseline in AK counts with ALA-PDT: 6.2 +/− 1.9 and MAL-PDT: 5.6 +/− 3.2
Apalla et al, 2010 Randomized placebo-controlled ALA-PDT versus placebo 39 12 months ALA-PDT: 64% and placebo: 26%
Kleinpenning et al, 2010 Comparative to baseline MAL-PDT 14 3 months 42.9%
Arisi et al, 2020 Randomized, cohort MAL-PDT, ingenol mebutate gel and diclofenac plus hyaluronate gel 90 patients, 30 in each cohort 90 days MAL-PDT: 23.07%, ingenol mebutate: 30% and diclofenac plus hyaluronate: 14.28%
Sotiriou et al, 2015 Randomized intraindividual comparison MAL-PDT versus. Imiquimod 5% 44 12 months No statistically significant difference between the two mirrored fields regarding the development of new lesions.
Jansen et al, 2019 Randomized, multicenter 5% fluorouracil, 5% imiquimod, MAL-PDT, or 0.015% ingenol mebutate 624 12 months Fluorouracil: 74.7%, imiquimod:53.9%; MAL-PDT: 37.7% and ingenol mebutate: 28.9%
Karrer et al, 2019 Open, interventional, multicenter MAL DL-PDT 50 3 months 62%
Assikar et al, 2020 Controlled randomized intra-individual DL-PDT versus PDT 26 3 and 6 months 3 months: DL-PDT: 90.5% and PDT: 94.2%; 6 months: DL-PDT:90.0% and PDT: 94.6%
Sotiriou et al, 2017 Randomized intra-individual comparative DL-PDT versus PDT 23 12 months DL-PDT: 78% and PDT: 80.6%
Lacour et al, 2005 Randomised investigator-blinded controlled phase III DL-PDT and PDT 108 12 weeks DL-PDT: 74% and PDT: 70%
Genovese et al, 2016 Intraindividual comparative DL-PDT versus ingenol mebutate 27 3 months DL-PDT: 72.4% and ingenol mebutate: 73.6%
Wiegell et al, 2012 Randomized multicenter MAL DL-PDT 145 3 months Grade I AKs: 75.9%, grade II: 61.2% and grade III: 49.1%
Ulrich et al, 2021 Vehicle-controlled phase III BF-200 ALA-PDT versus vehicle 50 12 months BF-200 ALA-PDT: 86.0% and vehicle: 32.9%
Salido-Vallejo et al, 2020 Single-centre, intraindividual, retrospective BF-200 ALA-PDT and DL-PDT(combPDT) versus DL-PDT 19 12 weeks combPDT: 31.6% and DL-PDT: 15.8%
Gracia-Cazaña et al, 2019 Observational, prospective, comparative DL-PDT versus DL-PDT plus ingenol mebutate 43 12 months DL-PDT: 75.2% and DL-PDT plus ingenol mebutate: 54.6%
Petukhova et al, 2017 Randomized, single-blinded, split-face controlled, 2-arm clinical trial. 10- or 20-minute ALA incubation times, after pretreatment with a microneedle or sham roller 32 1 month 20-minute incubation arm: microneedle: 76% and sham roller: 58%; 10-minute incubation arm: microneedle: 43% and sham roller: 38%
Torezan et al, 2013 Pilot split-face comparative Microneedling-PDT versus MAL-PDT 10 1 and 3 months At day 90, facial erythema (p = .04) and coarse wrinkles (p = .002) improved on the microneedling-PDT side, compared to MAL-PDT (p = .01).
Torezan et al, 2018 Randomized split-scalp comparative Calcipotriol-MAL-PDT versus. MAL-PDT 20 3 months Calcipotriol-MAL-PDT: 92.1% and MAL-PDT: 82.0%
Bullock et al, 2022 Interventional cohort-controlled Oral vitamin D3 combined with PDT versus MAL-PDT 29 patients in each group 3 to 6 months Oral vitamin D3 combined with PDT: 72.5% and MAL-PDT: 54.4%
Maytin et al, 2018 Bilaterally controlled PDT plus topical 5-fluorouracil versus PDT 17 3, 6, 9, and 12 months PDT plus topical 5-fluorouracil: 75% and PDT: 45% at 3 months; PDT plus topical 5-fluorouracil: 67% and PDT: 39% at 6 months
Pires et al, 2019 Intra-individual comparative Acoustic pressure wave ultrasound-CO2-MAL-PDT versus MAL-PDT 15 6 months Acoustic pressure wave ultrasound-CO2-MAL-PDT: 72% and MAL-PDT: 65%
Vrani et al, 2019 Randomized intraindividual comparison Fractional CO2 laser-PDT versus PDT 42 12 months Fractional laser-PDT: 47.2% and PDT: 52.3%
Togsverd-Bo et al, 2012 Randomized comparative Fractional CO2 laser-PDT versus PDT 15 3 months Fractional laser-PDT: 88% and PDT: 59%
Bento et al, 2021 Randomized controlled four-arm comparative DL-PDT; DL-PDT + microneedles; DL-PDT + CO2 laser; DL-PDT +microdermabrasion 40 patients, 10 patients at each group 3 and 6 months The DL-PDT+ microneedles group had a higher AK-clearance after 1 (p=0,002) and 3 (p=0,034) months. Similar in every group at 6 months (p=0,441)
Togsverd-Bo et al, 2015 Randomized controlled Ablative fractional laser (AFL)-assisted DL-PDT) (AFL-dPDT) versus DL-PDT), PDT and AFL alone (AFL) 16 3 months AFL-dPDT: 74%, DL-PDT: 46%, PDT: 50% and AFL: 5%
Togsverd-Bo et al, 2015 Randomized intra-individual controlled Repeated PDT every 6 months for AK prevention 25 3 years New AKs in 63% of patients in untreated skin areas versus 28% of patients in PDT-treated skin
Piacquadio et al, 2020 Randomized, parallel-group, evaluator-blinded ALA 2× versus ALA 3× versus vehicle PDT 166 52 weeks ALA 2x: 36.0%, ALA 3x: 37.5%, vehicle: 18.9%

ALA = 5-aminolevulinic acid; BF200-ALA = Nanoscale-lipid vesicle formulation with the prodrug 5-aminolevulinic acid;

PDT = photodynamic therapy;

AFXL-PDT = ablative fractional laser resurfacing photodynamic therapy;

DL = daylight photodynamic therapy;

MAL-PDT = methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy.