Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 28;9(11):e21673. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21673

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics and comparisons between couples who completed all assessments and couples who dropped out in demographic variables.

Completed (n = 80 couples)
M(SD)
Dropped out (n = 23 couples)
M(SD)
F (group)/χ2 Df p ηp2/Phi
Age 26.34 (4.99) 25.48 (3.24) .68 1 .41 .007
Relationship duration (months) 45.49 (36.84) 45.52 (36.06) .00 1 1.00 .000
Family status1,2 Married
Unmarried
23.8 %
76.3 %
17.4 %
82.6 %
.42 1 .52 .06
Cohabitation3,2 No
Yes
42.5 %
57.5 %
43.5 %
56.5 %
.01 1 .93 .008
Children3 - men No
Yes
83.8 %
16.2 %
95.7 %
4.3 %
2.16 1 .14 .15
Children3 - women No
Yes
85.0 %
15.0 %
95.7 %
4.3 %
1.84 1 .18 .13
Religiosity4 - men Secular
Non-secular
72.5 %
27.5 %
78.3 %
21.7 %
.31 1 .58 .06
Religiosity4 - women Secular
Non-secular
75.0 %
25.0 %
52.2 %
47.8 %
4.42 1 .04 .21
Years of education 13.94 (2.01) 13.13 (2.03) 4.55 1 .04 .04

Note: 1 nominal variable transformed into dichotomous variable.

2one score was computed for each couple.

3variables inserted in a dichotomous manner.

4ordinal variable transformed into a dichotomous variable.