| Andersen, 201316
 | 
Denmark | 
Randomised controlled trial | 
To explore the effects of email prompts on stair climbing on CVD risk | 
160 office workers (125 F, aged 42 yrs, 90 % of work hours in sitting) | 
(1) Intervention group: received email prompt-based stair climbing reminders for 10 min every day for 8 weeks (2) control group: pursued usual work | 
 | 
- 
•
CRF ↑ 1.45 ml/min/kg at 10-week 
 
- 
•
SBP, DBP ↓ 4.81 mmHg in email group 
 
- 
•
No significant changes in weight 
 
- 
•
Low cost email-based encouragements to do daily stair- at work may improves CVD risk among adults in sedentary occupations. 
 
  | 
| Azmi, 202211
 | 
United Kingdom | 
Quasi experimental study | 
To investigate the stair climbing effects on glucose and lipid profiles | 
- 
•
16 sedentary office workers, (11M, 5F) 
 
- 
•
Sedentary able to climb regularly 
 
  | 
- 
•
Four-floors staircase continuously for 8 times a day spread across workdays for 8-week period for 2 min 
 
- 
•
Every hour prompt from computer 
 
- 
•
Pedometer measured steps and log-based stair climb 
 
- 
•
Control group: participants with the buildings less than 4 floors of university 
 
  | 
- 
•
Venous samples 
 
- 
•
Fasting and 2hrs post prandial glucose, LDL, VLDL, HDL, triglycerides and total cholesterol 
 
- 
•
Enzymatic calorimetric assays 
 
  | 
- 
•
Physiological improvements in LDL-C, TC, TC/HDL-C ratio, non-HDL-C and fasting blood glucose in the experimental group while no change in control group. 
 
- 
•
Mean change TG (-0.06 mmol/L), TC (−0.6 mmol/L), HDL-C (+0.16 mmol/L), LDL-C (no change), TC/HDL (−0.4) and FG (−0.16 mmol/L) 
 
- 
•
Behavioral response: no change in the floors climbed (linear, quadratic trends) 
 
- 
•
↓in total step counts over the weeks of the study 
 
  | 
| Boreham, 200517
 | 
Ireland | 
Non-randomised controlled trial | 
To investigate the effects of stair climbing on VO2max, blood lipids, and homocysteine levels among sedentary and healthy young women | 
 | 
randomly assigned to 8 weeks (1) Intervention group: progressive stair climb. 2 bouts of climb every day, 5 days, increasing one climb every two week (2) control group | 
- 
•
VO2 max: incremental cycle test and metabolic cart 
 
- 
•
Blood lipids and homocysteine: venous samples (TC, TG, HDL, LDL) 
 
  | 
- 
•
No significant changes in BMI, TC, HDL-C, TC/HDL-C ratio, TG, or homocysteine. 
 
- 
•
Compared to controls, the stair climbing group showed a significant ↑in VO2max (+3.5 ml/kg/min) and a ↓ in LDL-C (-0.34 mmoL/l). 
 
  | 
| Cabral-Santos, 202118
 | 
Netherlands | 
Randomized controlled study | 
to determine whether breaking up prolonged sitting with stair climbing bouts with or without high carb diet alter acute inflammatory response. | 
40 [10 lean males, 10 overweight/obese (OW) males; 10 lean females. 10 OW females] | 
Four interventions: control group with 9 h sitting with (1) low carbohydrate or (2) high carbohydrate snack; and stair climbing intervention (15–30 s × 8) with (3) low carbohydrate and (4) high carbohydrate snacks | 
- 
•
At baseline, 3rd and 6th hour assessed 
 
- 
•
Immune: IL-6, TNF-α and Salivary Immunoglobulin A (SIgA) 
 
  | 
- 
•
TNF-α levels remained same in both groups 
 
- 
•
At 540 min mark, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) reduces more in OW with HC snack group 
 
- 
•
Salivary Immunoglobulin A was always higher in lean and active group but OW adults had elevate levels on both conditions 
 
- 
•
Stair-climbing post sedentary behaviour reduces acute IL-6 levels in plasma for •When stair-climbing is accompanied by changes in nutrition SIgA level was increased in OW population 
 
  | 
| Chen, 201719
 | 
Taiwan | 
Quasi randomised experimental study | 
To compare effects on BMD, lipid profile, insulin sensitivity and physical fitness between DSE and ASE individuals. | 
 | 
- 
•
Three interventions: (1) descending stairs (DSE); (2) ascending stairs (ASE); (3) control groups 
 
- 
•
Twice per weeks, 12 weeks 
 
- 
•
Stairs of a 10-story building 
 
  | 
- 
•
upper thigh circumference, muscle soreness, balance and the right calcaneus BMD 
 
- 
•
functional fitness tests for senior adults consisting of 30-s chair stand, 2-min step, 8-ft up and go, 6-min walk and 6-m tandem walk 
 
- 
•
Lipid profile, HOMA-IR, HbA1C 
 
- 
•
MVC of extensors 
 
  | 
- 
•
HR, BP (−8.6 %) lower in DSE than ASE 
 
- 
•
No significant changes in MVC-ISO force, plasma CK activity, and VAS of muscle soreness 
 
- 
•
No significant difference in weight, body fat change between interventions 
 
- 
•
MVC increase with DSE (34 % VS 19 %) than ASE 
 
- 
•
The magnitude of increase in balance and insulin sensitivity was higher in DSE than ASE 
 
  | 
| Cho, 202020
 | 
South Korea | 
Randomised cross over study design | 
To explore the acute effects of stair climbing interruptions during prolonged sitting on vascular and metabolic function after a high-fat meal | 
12 healthy adults (age: 23.5 ± 2.9 years) | 
Two interventions 1) a 4-h uninterrupted sitting (sitting trial) or 2) a 4-h sitting interrupted with a 5-min stair climbing (66 % of HRR) every hour after a high fat meal | 
- 
•
Metabolic fitness: TG, glucose concentrations, 
 
- 
•
Popliteal artery blood flow and shear rate 
 
- 
•
Measured every hour after a high-fat meal, 
 
- 
•
Brachial artery FMD @ baseline and end of the session 
 
  | 
- 
•
Plasma TG and glucose ↑ after a high-fat meal and returned to baseline at the end 
 
- 
•
Brachial artery FMD ↓ (−1.81 %) in the continued sitting, but not with the stair climb interrupted trial (+0.87 %) 
 
- 
•
Compared with the sitting trial, the interrupted trial improved popliteal blood flow and shear rate 
 
  | 
| Chow, 202021
 | 
China | 
Randomized controlled study | 
To examine the effects of stair exercise on cardiometabolic risk in young obese Chinese females | 
36 inactive female college students with body fat percentage >30 %, no exercise, no chronic diseases | 
- 
•
Three interventions: (1) descending stairs (DSE); (2) ascending stairs (ASE); (3) control groups 
 
- 
•
Thrice per weeks, 12 weeks 
 
- 
•
1st week – 96 steps × 5 reps/session, progress to 27 reps at 12th week 
 
  | 
- 
•
DEXA (body fat%, whole-body fat mass, trunk fat mass, abdominal, lower limb fat and muscle mass. 
 
- 
•
fasting blood glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, IL-6 and TNF-α. 
 
- 
•
Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay kits 
 
- 
•
Before and after 12 weeks 
 
  | 
- 
•
↑ Insulin sensitivity 3.5-fold in the DSE group compared with ASE group (−33.2 % vs. −9.8 %). 
 
- 
•
Proinflammatory factors showed significant decreases in TNF-α (−39.9 % vs. −23.2 %). 
 
- 
•
Significant reduction in body fat mass was observed for the two exercise groups with no significant difference for the mean values 
 
  | 
| Donath, 201422
 | 
Switzerland | 
Non-randomised controlled study | 
To investigate the effects of two 8-week stair-climbing interventions on balance, gait, strength, and endurance in healthy seniors. | 
48 enrolled but 39 elderly (22 F) completed Aged 61–83 years, BMI 25.08 | 
- 
•
Three interventions: (1) one step strategy; (2) 2-step strategy during stair climb training; (3) control groups –three supervised social sessions (bowling, playing billiards, and darts in 8 weeks 
 
- 
•
3 sessions/week, 8 weeks 
 
- 
•
Supervised – garage, 8 floor climbing 
 
  | 
- 
•
Static balance (force plate), dynamic balance (beam walk), functional reach 
 
- 
•
Gait (timing gates), strength (double, single leg press) and submaximal endurance before and after 8 weeks 
 
  | 
- 
•
Did not change maximal strength and explosive power 
 
- 
•
HR max increased in 2 steps climb group compared to other while HR rest reduced 
 
- 
•
Balance improved in 2 steps climb group compared to other 
 
- 
•
Time effects were seen for functional reach but no between group 
 
- 
•
stair-climbing interventions did not alter static balance, spatiotemporal gait characteristics, and strength performance in healthy seniors 
 
  | 
| Gay, 201823
 | 
United states | 
Cross-over trial | 
To determine the effects of 2-min and 4-min bouts of vigorous-intensity stair climbing on glucose levels. | 
9 overweight/obese adults ranging between ages of 40–64 years with prediabetes and HbA1C levels ranging between 5.7% and 6.4 % | 
Three interventions: (1) control group; (2) stair-climbing in bouts of 2 min, every hour for 8 h; (3) stair-climbing in bouts of 4 min, followed in every 2 h for 8-h duration. | 
 | 
- 
•
4 min bout had significant decrease in glucose after 30 min, especially for people with ≥90 mg/dl pre exercise glucose levels 
 
- 
•
2 min bout effect was similar to control group. 
 
- 
•
Population with pre-exercise glucose level <90 mg/dl did not show much change in post exercise glucose levels 
 
  | 
| Jenkins, 201924
 | 
Canada | 
Randomised controlled trial | 
To explore the effect of stair climbing exercise “snacks” on peak oxygen uptake | 
- 
•
Twenty-four young adults 
 
- 
•
No known CVD 
 
  | 
- 
•
vigorously ascending a 3-flights (60 steps), 
 
- 
•
3 bouts daily 
 
- 
•
separated by 1–4 h of recovery, 3 days/week for 6 weeks 
 
- 
•
Supervised 
 
  | 
 | 
- 
•
Peak VO2 ↑ in the climbers compared to controls 
 
- 
•
VO2peak was higher in the training group compared with control (1918 ± 326 ml/min 
 
- 
•
Wpeak was also higher in the training group compared with control (178 ± 32 W) 
 
  | 
| Kennedy, 200725
 | 
United Kingdom | 
Parallel group trial | 
To investigate the effects of accumulated bouts of stair walking on CRF, BMI and blood lipids in sedentary office workers | 
 | 
- 
•
Progressive stair climb 
 
- 
•
Two interventions: (1) stair climb (1 bout/day, 5 days/week, 8 weeks, progressing to 3 climbs gradually; (2) control group 
 
- 
•
75 steps/min 
 
- 
•
Supervised 
 
  | 
- 
•
Body fat (bioelectrical impedance analysis) 
 
- 
•
VO2 max (YMCA submaximal cycle test) 
 
- 
•
Metabolic fitness: TC, TG, HDL, VLDL 
 
- 
•
Pre and post 8 weeks 
 
  | 
- 
•
Relative to controls, the stairclimbing group showed a significant increase in predicted VO2max (9.4 %, +2.1 ml/kg/min). 
 
- 
•
No other significant changes were noted. 
 
- 
•
modest amounts of stairclimbing may be one of the most time efficient methods of improving and maintaining the health of sedentary individuals. 
 
  | 
| Lim, 202014
 | 
Canada | 
Non-blinded parallel group | 
To compare the effects of 12 wk of usual and stair climbing– based HIIT program on skeletal muscle phenotype in individuals with CAD. | 
- 
•
20 CVD (18 M, 2 F), undergone recent treatment for CAD 
 
- 
•
No pacemakers, <2 months cardiac procedures 
 
  | 
Randomised to either usual cardiac rehab (30 min at 60%–80% of peak heart rate) or STAIR (three bouts of one flight (12 steps), 3–6 flights/day for 12 wk. 4 weeks of supervised and 8 weeks of unsupervised | 
- 
•
Muscle biopsies of vastus lateralis before, after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks 
 
- 
•
Fiber cross-sectional area, satellite cell content, and mitochondrial function through immunohistochemistry and western blot test. 
 
  | 
- 
•
Participants with CAD had a 52 % lower prevalence of Type I fibres and 1$ higher type 2 fibres 
 
- 
•
No significant differences in type 1 and II fibres after exercise training 
 
- 
•
Satellite cells increased at 4th week 
 
- 
•
No differences in capillarisation or myonuclei 
 
- 
•
Significant increase in phosphorylation and e-NOS at 4th week while no difference at 12th week 
 
- 
•
The changes are comparable with short time of stair (5 min) vs traditional exercise training (33 min) 
 
  | 
| McCulley, 199426
 | 
United states | 
Non-randomised controlled trial | 
to determine the efficacy of stair climb compared with walk/run training, for improving CRF and reducing adiposity | 
• 19 sedentary, middle-aged male volunteers (40–65 years old) • Free from diseases • 12 for walk or stair while 7 chosen as sedentary controls | 
- 
•
Three interventions: (1) STAIR (StairMaster 4000), (2) WALK; (3) SED for 14 weeks, 3–4 day/week, 30–45 min/day 
 
- 
•
70–80 % of MHR 
 
- 
•
The training load was gradually increased to 80–85 % MHR at 14th week 
 
- 
•
Supervised training 
 
  | 
 | 
- 
•
Absolute VO2max increased by 19.6 %in the stair and 19.4 % in the walk/run group, 
 
- 
•
Relative VO2max increased by 20.1 % and 20.2 % in the stair and walk/run groups, respectively. 
 
- 
•
Fat mass decreased by ≈ 2.7 kgs in both intervention groups 
 
- 
•
Body fat % decreased and equal (−2.5 % body fat) in both groups with training. 
 
  | 
| Meyer, 201027
 | 
Switzerland | 
Single group experimental trial | 
to evaluate impact of a worksite-based promotional campaign of stair use on cardiometabolic risk in apparently healthy adults | 
 | 
- 
•
Posters motivating the stair climb posted at ‘point of choice’ 
 
- 
•
Campaigns for stair use 
 
- 
•
12 weeks 
 
- 
•
Hospital building (12 stories, 2 floors per story, 10 steps/flight) 
 
- 
•
Use during working hours 
 
  | 
- 
•
Physical activity levels by actigraph GT1M 
 
- 
•
Maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max): Chester step test 
 
- 
•
Body composition (Bioelectric impedance) 
 
- 
•
At 0th, 3rd and 6th month 
 
  | 
- 
•
At 12 weeks, VO2max had increased by 9.2 ± 15.1 % (P < 0.001). 
 
- 
•
BMI (↓ 0.7 ± 2.6 %), fat mass (↓−1.5 ± 8.4 % and waist circumference (↓−1.7 ± 2.9 %) (P < 0.001). 
 
- 
•
Significant decrease of DBP (−1.8 ± 8.9 %,) and a marginal reduction of systolic pressure (−1.3 ± 7.2 %, P = 0.075). 
 
- 
•
LDL cholesterol had decreased by 3.0 ± 13.5 % (P = 0.026). 
 
  | 
| Michael, 20217
 | 
Cyprus | 
Randomized controlled study | 
To test the effects of walking up and down stairs at home on a range of CVD and MetS risk factors | 
52 sedentary females (18–45 years) from four different Cyprus companies | 
- 
•
Three interventions: (1) home based stair climb (10 floors of climbing), (2) gym based stair climb (Leekon stair machine – 50 steps/min, 143 steps, 2–5 bouts/day); (3) control 
 
- 
•
5 days a week for period of 8 weeks. 
 
- 
•
progressed till 5 ascents per day in the last two weeks 
 
  | 
- 
•
Fat percentage: 7 skinfold 
 
- 
•
VO2 max: 20 m shuttle run 
 
- 
•
Leg power: counter movement jump 
 
- 
•
Metabolic fitness: TC, TG, VLDL, Glucose, HDL 
 
  | 
- 
•
significantly increased aerobic fitness (VO2 max and lactate) in stir climb group 
 
- 
•
Slight increase of jump height in CMJ in experimental group (p ≤ 0.01) 
 
- 
•
HDL ↑ and VLDL ↓ 
 
- 
•
Home-based stair climbing was responsible for lowering fasting blood glucose (p = 0.03) 
 
  | 
| Mir, 201728
 | 
Malaysia | 
Non-randomised controlled study | 
To compare the effectiveness of 4 weeks stair climbing intervention with walking on cardiometabolic outcomes | 
- 
•
37 young adults (18–25 years) 
 
- 
•
Healthy with no apparent illness 
 
- 
•
living a sedentary lifestyle. 
 
  | 
- 
•
Three interventions: (1) full stair climb (7 floors, 14 flights); (2) half stair climb (3.5 floors, 7 flights) and one-mile treadmill walk 
 
- 
•
Self-selected speed 
 
- 
•
Twice day, 5 days a week and 4 weeks 
 
  | 
 | 
- 
•
Significant improvement in VO2 max (11.66 ml/kg/min) in full stair climb while no significant difference in other two groups 
 
- 
•
No statistical difference in the physical fitness index within and between groups 
 
- 
•
significant reduction (p < 0.005) in time taken to complete the intervention in the all three groups 
 
  | 
| Ozaki, 201929
 | 
Japan | 
Experimental study | 
To explore the additive effects of stair-climb to routine walk program on muscle thickness and strength. | 
- 
•
15 elderly participants (age >65 years) 
 
- 
•
free of any overt chronic disease, 
 
- 
•
not past or current smokers, 
 
- 
•
not taking any medications 
 
  | 
- 
•
Two interventions: (1) walking alone; (2) walking + stair climb 
 
- 
•
17 weeks progressive walking (self selected speed initially progressing to 65–80 % HRR during final weeks 
 
- 
•
Walk + stair group had additional incremental step training 
 
  | 
 | 
- 
•
Except lower leg, thigh muscle thickness improved within condition 
 
- 
•
After 6 weeks, knee flexion and extension strength improved 
 
- 
•
No interaction effects between group x time was noted 
 
- 
•
Stair climbing did not provide additional training effects 
 
  | 
| Paschalis, 201330
 | 
Cyprus | 
Parallel group controlled trial | 
To compare the effect of two sessions of stair descending versus stair ascending exercise on muscle performance and health-related parameters in young healthy men | 
 | 
- 
•
Two interventions: (1) a stair descending group and (2) a stair ascending group 
 
- 
•
Automatic escalator device 
 
- 
•
5 min stair climbing/bout, 5 bouts/day 
 
- 
•
Speed was set at 60 steps/min 
 
  | 
- 
•
Creatinine kinase (index of muscle damage) 
 
- 
•
Isometric knee extensor – isokinetic dynamometer 
 
- 
•
Blood chemistry: insulin sensitivity, blood lipid profile and redox status 
 
- 
•
during 1st session and 2nd session interspersed with 3 weeks. 
 
  | 
- 
•
Significant interaction for ROM, torque and DOMS 
 
- 
•
Insulin resistance due to muscle damage due to bout 1 
 
- 
•
Bout 1 of ascending or descending stair climb causes more muscle damage 
 
- 
•
Successive stair climbs positively influence insulin sensitivity and lipid profile 
 
- 
•
stair descending exercise systematically caused greater elevations in insulin sensitivity indices compared to stair ascending exercise. 
 
  | 
| Rafiei, 202031
 | 
Canada | 
Randomised cross over study | 
to investigate brief stair climbing exercise “snacks” could lower postprandial insulin, glucose, and free fatty acids responses during prolonged sitting | 
N = 22 (12 healthy weight, 11 overweight) | 
completed two interventions: 1) sedentary (9-h sitting) and 2) stair climbing snacks (8 × 15–30 s once per hour). | 
 | 
Healthy weight- 
•
no significant differences between conditions for total (9-h) insulin AUC (P = 0.24, d = 0.4), total glucose AUC (P = 0.17, d = 0.48), total non-esterified fatty acid AUC (P = 0.22, d = 0.4), or total TG AUC (P = 0.72). 
  
Overweight
- 
•
total insulin AUC (−16.5 %, P = 0.036, d = 0.94) and total NEFA AUC (−21 %, P = 0.016, d = 1.2) were significantly lower in SS versus SED. 
 
- 
•
No differences were found for total glucose and triglyceride AUC (all, P > 0.31) 
 
 
 | 
| Takaishi, 201232
 | 
Japan | 
Non-randomised cross over study | 
To explore the effectiveness of stair climb interventions on postprandial glucose in glucose impaired participants | 
11 healthy participants. Not engaging in regular and strenuous ex. | 
Two visits: (1) STAIR: stair climbing visit: 80–110 steps/min (moderate intensity corresponding to 60 % HRR and 13 RPE); (2) WALK: self selected walk speed on 650 m course for 2 h for 6 min at 90th min | 
 | 
- 
•
At 90th min, no diff in glucose levels between WALK and stair 
 
- 
•
At 105th min, blood glucose levels lower in STAIR compared to WALK 
 
- 
•
STAIR reduced by 2.5 mmol/dl and WALK reduced by 0.7 mmol/dl 
 
- 
•
Blood lactate increased after STAIR compared to WALK 
 
  | 
| Takaishi, 201415
 | 
Japan | 
Narrative review | 
To summarize the studies that have investigated the effects of stair-ascending exercise | 
Inference
- 
•
Eight studies (1975–2010). 
 
- 
•
Work intensity on stairs was found to be similar to that of uphill treadmill walk and loaded bicycle training 
 
- 
•
Oxygen consumption was estimated for the stair climbing bouts 
 
- 
•
CRF and metabolic fitness can be improved by accumulating bouts of short-duration exercise with stairs 
 
- 
•
VO2 for ascending = 33 ml/kg/min while ascending and descending exercise is 19.2 ml/kg/min 
 
- 
•
5 min stair climbing exercise reduced the blood glucose concentration by 60 mg/dl (3.3 mmoL/l) 
 
- 
•
stair climbing improves CVD health and fitness, but should be prescribed for elderly with caution 
 
 
 | 
| Takaishi, 201733
 | 
Japan | 
Experimental cross over trial | 
to confirm acute effect of stair exercise on postprandial hyperglycaemia by comparing it cycle exercise performed at the same workload | 
 | 
Two visits: (1) ST-EX: descending stair (60–65 % HRR, RPE – 13–14), 21 steps, 8–10 reps; STEP RATE – 80–110 (2) Bi-EX: 50–60 reps/minute progressing to predetermined workload | 
 | 
- 
•
blood glucose level ↓ between 90 and 105 min after a meal was significantly greater for ST-EX (−4.0 ± 0.7 mmol/L) than for BI-EX (−2.7 ± 0.9 mmol/L). 
 
- 
•
Serum insulin levels did not differ between the groups. 
 
• VO2 max for ST-EX was ↑ than that for BI-EX,  
- 
•
Lactate level and RER for ST-EX were ↓ than BI-EX. 
 
  | 
| Whittaker AC, 20218
 | 
Netherlands | 
Secondary analysis study | 
to explore the association between stair climbing and the metabolic syndrome. | 
 | 
Nurses enquired the exposure of “Do you climb stairs daily?’ (yes/no)” | 
- 
•
TG and HDL (enzymatic colorimetric methods) 
 
- 
•
glucose levels (photometric assay) 
 
- 
•
waist circumference, BP through sphygmanometer 
 
- 
•
Composite scores for Metabolic syndrome (MetS) 
 
  | 
- 
•
who did not climb stairs daily were at greater risk for MetS (OR = 1.90), 
 
- 
•
the components affected high blood glucose, (OR = 1.73), TG (OR = 1.49) and BP (OR = 1.50). 
 
  | 
| Yamaji, 202134
 | 
Japan | 
Cross sectional study | 
To explore the relation between daily stair climbing activity and vascular function | 
 | 
Three groups based on their daily stair climbing habit: no stairs group, climbing stairs to the 2nd-floor group, and climbing stairs to the ≥3rd-floor group | 
 | 
- 
•
FMD (3.3 %) ↑ in stair group >3 floors compared to stair <2 floors and no stair group 
 
- 
•
↓NID seen in no stairs (7.4 %) group compared to < 2 floors (10.9 %) and >3 floors (11.3 %) 
 
- 
•
Endothelial function impaired in no stair group 
 
  |