Andersen, 201316
|
Denmark |
Randomised controlled trial |
To explore the effects of email prompts on stair climbing on CVD risk |
160 office workers (125 F, aged 42 yrs, 90 % of work hours in sitting) |
(1) Intervention group: received email prompt-based stair climbing reminders for 10 min every day for 8 weeks (2) control group: pursued usual work |
|
-
•
CRF ↑ 1.45 ml/min/kg at 10-week
-
•
SBP, DBP ↓ 4.81 mmHg in email group
-
•
No significant changes in weight
-
•
Low cost email-based encouragements to do daily stair- at work may improves CVD risk among adults in sedentary occupations.
|
Azmi, 202211
|
United Kingdom |
Quasi experimental study |
To investigate the stair climbing effects on glucose and lipid profiles |
-
•
16 sedentary office workers, (11M, 5F)
-
•
Sedentary able to climb regularly
|
-
•
Four-floors staircase continuously for 8 times a day spread across workdays for 8-week period for 2 min
-
•
Every hour prompt from computer
-
•
Pedometer measured steps and log-based stair climb
-
•
Control group: participants with the buildings less than 4 floors of university
|
-
•
Venous samples
-
•
Fasting and 2hrs post prandial glucose, LDL, VLDL, HDL, triglycerides and total cholesterol
-
•
Enzymatic calorimetric assays
|
-
•
Physiological improvements in LDL-C, TC, TC/HDL-C ratio, non-HDL-C and fasting blood glucose in the experimental group while no change in control group.
-
•
Mean change TG (-0.06 mmol/L), TC (−0.6 mmol/L), HDL-C (+0.16 mmol/L), LDL-C (no change), TC/HDL (−0.4) and FG (−0.16 mmol/L)
-
•
Behavioral response: no change in the floors climbed (linear, quadratic trends)
-
•
↓in total step counts over the weeks of the study
|
Boreham, 200517
|
Ireland |
Non-randomised controlled trial |
To investigate the effects of stair climbing on VO2max, blood lipids, and homocysteine levels among sedentary and healthy young women |
|
randomly assigned to 8 weeks (1) Intervention group: progressive stair climb. 2 bouts of climb every day, 5 days, increasing one climb every two week (2) control group |
-
•
VO2 max: incremental cycle test and metabolic cart
-
•
Blood lipids and homocysteine: venous samples (TC, TG, HDL, LDL)
|
-
•
No significant changes in BMI, TC, HDL-C, TC/HDL-C ratio, TG, or homocysteine.
-
•
Compared to controls, the stair climbing group showed a significant ↑in VO2max (+3.5 ml/kg/min) and a ↓ in LDL-C (-0.34 mmoL/l).
|
Cabral-Santos, 202118
|
Netherlands |
Randomized controlled study |
to determine whether breaking up prolonged sitting with stair climbing bouts with or without high carb diet alter acute inflammatory response. |
40 [10 lean males, 10 overweight/obese (OW) males; 10 lean females. 10 OW females] |
Four interventions: control group with 9 h sitting with (1) low carbohydrate or (2) high carbohydrate snack; and stair climbing intervention (15–30 s × 8) with (3) low carbohydrate and (4) high carbohydrate snacks |
-
•
At baseline, 3rd and 6th hour assessed
-
•
Immune: IL-6, TNF-α and Salivary Immunoglobulin A (SIgA)
|
-
•
TNF-α levels remained same in both groups
-
•
At 540 min mark, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) reduces more in OW with HC snack group
-
•
Salivary Immunoglobulin A was always higher in lean and active group but OW adults had elevate levels on both conditions
-
•
Stair-climbing post sedentary behaviour reduces acute IL-6 levels in plasma for •When stair-climbing is accompanied by changes in nutrition SIgA level was increased in OW population
|
Chen, 201719
|
Taiwan |
Quasi randomised experimental study |
To compare effects on BMD, lipid profile, insulin sensitivity and physical fitness between DSE and ASE individuals. |
|
-
•
Three interventions: (1) descending stairs (DSE); (2) ascending stairs (ASE); (3) control groups
-
•
Twice per weeks, 12 weeks
-
•
Stairs of a 10-story building
|
-
•
upper thigh circumference, muscle soreness, balance and the right calcaneus BMD
-
•
functional fitness tests for senior adults consisting of 30-s chair stand, 2-min step, 8-ft up and go, 6-min walk and 6-m tandem walk
-
•
Lipid profile, HOMA-IR, HbA1C
-
•
MVC of extensors
|
-
•
HR, BP (−8.6 %) lower in DSE than ASE
-
•
No significant changes in MVC-ISO force, plasma CK activity, and VAS of muscle soreness
-
•
No significant difference in weight, body fat change between interventions
-
•
MVC increase with DSE (34 % VS 19 %) than ASE
-
•
The magnitude of increase in balance and insulin sensitivity was higher in DSE than ASE
|
Cho, 202020
|
South Korea |
Randomised cross over study design |
To explore the acute effects of stair climbing interruptions during prolonged sitting on vascular and metabolic function after a high-fat meal |
12 healthy adults (age: 23.5 ± 2.9 years) |
Two interventions 1) a 4-h uninterrupted sitting (sitting trial) or 2) a 4-h sitting interrupted with a 5-min stair climbing (66 % of HRR) every hour after a high fat meal |
-
•
Metabolic fitness: TG, glucose concentrations,
-
•
Popliteal artery blood flow and shear rate
-
•
Measured every hour after a high-fat meal,
-
•
Brachial artery FMD @ baseline and end of the session
|
-
•
Plasma TG and glucose ↑ after a high-fat meal and returned to baseline at the end
-
•
Brachial artery FMD ↓ (−1.81 %) in the continued sitting, but not with the stair climb interrupted trial (+0.87 %)
-
•
Compared with the sitting trial, the interrupted trial improved popliteal blood flow and shear rate
|
Chow, 202021
|
China |
Randomized controlled study |
To examine the effects of stair exercise on cardiometabolic risk in young obese Chinese females |
36 inactive female college students with body fat percentage >30 %, no exercise, no chronic diseases |
-
•
Three interventions: (1) descending stairs (DSE); (2) ascending stairs (ASE); (3) control groups
-
•
Thrice per weeks, 12 weeks
-
•
1st week – 96 steps × 5 reps/session, progress to 27 reps at 12th week
|
-
•
DEXA (body fat%, whole-body fat mass, trunk fat mass, abdominal, lower limb fat and muscle mass.
-
•
fasting blood glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, IL-6 and TNF-α.
-
•
Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay kits
-
•
Before and after 12 weeks
|
-
•
↑ Insulin sensitivity 3.5-fold in the DSE group compared with ASE group (−33.2 % vs. −9.8 %).
-
•
Proinflammatory factors showed significant decreases in TNF-α (−39.9 % vs. −23.2 %).
-
•
Significant reduction in body fat mass was observed for the two exercise groups with no significant difference for the mean values
|
Donath, 201422
|
Switzerland |
Non-randomised controlled study |
To investigate the effects of two 8-week stair-climbing interventions on balance, gait, strength, and endurance in healthy seniors. |
48 enrolled but 39 elderly (22 F) completed Aged 61–83 years, BMI 25.08 |
-
•
Three interventions: (1) one step strategy; (2) 2-step strategy during stair climb training; (3) control groups –three supervised social sessions (bowling, playing billiards, and darts in 8 weeks
-
•
3 sessions/week, 8 weeks
-
•
Supervised – garage, 8 floor climbing
|
-
•
Static balance (force plate), dynamic balance (beam walk), functional reach
-
•
Gait (timing gates), strength (double, single leg press) and submaximal endurance before and after 8 weeks
|
-
•
Did not change maximal strength and explosive power
-
•
HR max increased in 2 steps climb group compared to other while HR rest reduced
-
•
Balance improved in 2 steps climb group compared to other
-
•
Time effects were seen for functional reach but no between group
-
•
stair-climbing interventions did not alter static balance, spatiotemporal gait characteristics, and strength performance in healthy seniors
|
Gay, 201823
|
United states |
Cross-over trial |
To determine the effects of 2-min and 4-min bouts of vigorous-intensity stair climbing on glucose levels. |
9 overweight/obese adults ranging between ages of 40–64 years with prediabetes and HbA1C levels ranging between 5.7% and 6.4 % |
Three interventions: (1) control group; (2) stair-climbing in bouts of 2 min, every hour for 8 h; (3) stair-climbing in bouts of 4 min, followed in every 2 h for 8-h duration. |
|
-
•
4 min bout had significant decrease in glucose after 30 min, especially for people with ≥90 mg/dl pre exercise glucose levels
-
•
2 min bout effect was similar to control group.
-
•
Population with pre-exercise glucose level <90 mg/dl did not show much change in post exercise glucose levels
|
Jenkins, 201924
|
Canada |
Randomised controlled trial |
To explore the effect of stair climbing exercise “snacks” on peak oxygen uptake |
-
•
Twenty-four young adults
-
•
No known CVD
|
-
•
vigorously ascending a 3-flights (60 steps),
-
•
3 bouts daily
-
•
separated by 1–4 h of recovery, 3 days/week for 6 weeks
-
•
Supervised
|
|
-
•
Peak VO2 ↑ in the climbers compared to controls
-
•
VO2peak was higher in the training group compared with control (1918 ± 326 ml/min
-
•
Wpeak was also higher in the training group compared with control (178 ± 32 W)
|
Kennedy, 200725
|
United Kingdom |
Parallel group trial |
To investigate the effects of accumulated bouts of stair walking on CRF, BMI and blood lipids in sedentary office workers |
|
-
•
Progressive stair climb
-
•
Two interventions: (1) stair climb (1 bout/day, 5 days/week, 8 weeks, progressing to 3 climbs gradually; (2) control group
-
•
75 steps/min
-
•
Supervised
|
-
•
Body fat (bioelectrical impedance analysis)
-
•
VO2 max (YMCA submaximal cycle test)
-
•
Metabolic fitness: TC, TG, HDL, VLDL
-
•
Pre and post 8 weeks
|
-
•
Relative to controls, the stairclimbing group showed a significant increase in predicted VO2max (9.4 %, +2.1 ml/kg/min).
-
•
No other significant changes were noted.
-
•
modest amounts of stairclimbing may be one of the most time efficient methods of improving and maintaining the health of sedentary individuals.
|
Lim, 202014
|
Canada |
Non-blinded parallel group |
To compare the effects of 12 wk of usual and stair climbing– based HIIT program on skeletal muscle phenotype in individuals with CAD. |
-
•
20 CVD (18 M, 2 F), undergone recent treatment for CAD
-
•
No pacemakers, <2 months cardiac procedures
|
Randomised to either usual cardiac rehab (30 min at 60%–80% of peak heart rate) or STAIR (three bouts of one flight (12 steps), 3–6 flights/day for 12 wk. 4 weeks of supervised and 8 weeks of unsupervised |
-
•
Muscle biopsies of vastus lateralis before, after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks
-
•
Fiber cross-sectional area, satellite cell content, and mitochondrial function through immunohistochemistry and western blot test.
|
-
•
Participants with CAD had a 52 % lower prevalence of Type I fibres and 1$ higher type 2 fibres
-
•
No significant differences in type 1 and II fibres after exercise training
-
•
Satellite cells increased at 4th week
-
•
No differences in capillarisation or myonuclei
-
•
Significant increase in phosphorylation and e-NOS at 4th week while no difference at 12th week
-
•
The changes are comparable with short time of stair (5 min) vs traditional exercise training (33 min)
|
McCulley, 199426
|
United states |
Non-randomised controlled trial |
to determine the efficacy of stair climb compared with walk/run training, for improving CRF and reducing adiposity |
• 19 sedentary, middle-aged male volunteers (40–65 years old) • Free from diseases • 12 for walk or stair while 7 chosen as sedentary controls |
-
•
Three interventions: (1) STAIR (StairMaster 4000), (2) WALK; (3) SED for 14 weeks, 3–4 day/week, 30–45 min/day
-
•
70–80 % of MHR
-
•
The training load was gradually increased to 80–85 % MHR at 14th week
-
•
Supervised training
|
|
-
•
Absolute VO2max increased by 19.6 %in the stair and 19.4 % in the walk/run group,
-
•
Relative VO2max increased by 20.1 % and 20.2 % in the stair and walk/run groups, respectively.
-
•
Fat mass decreased by ≈ 2.7 kgs in both intervention groups
-
•
Body fat % decreased and equal (−2.5 % body fat) in both groups with training.
|
Meyer, 201027
|
Switzerland |
Single group experimental trial |
to evaluate impact of a worksite-based promotional campaign of stair use on cardiometabolic risk in apparently healthy adults |
|
-
•
Posters motivating the stair climb posted at ‘point of choice’
-
•
Campaigns for stair use
-
•
12 weeks
-
•
Hospital building (12 stories, 2 floors per story, 10 steps/flight)
-
•
Use during working hours
|
-
•
Physical activity levels by actigraph GT1M
-
•
Maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max): Chester step test
-
•
Body composition (Bioelectric impedance)
-
•
At 0th, 3rd and 6th month
|
-
•
At 12 weeks, VO2max had increased by 9.2 ± 15.1 % (P < 0.001).
-
•
BMI (↓ 0.7 ± 2.6 %), fat mass (↓−1.5 ± 8.4 % and waist circumference (↓−1.7 ± 2.9 %) (P < 0.001).
-
•
Significant decrease of DBP (−1.8 ± 8.9 %,) and a marginal reduction of systolic pressure (−1.3 ± 7.2 %, P = 0.075).
-
•
LDL cholesterol had decreased by 3.0 ± 13.5 % (P = 0.026).
|
Michael, 20217
|
Cyprus |
Randomized controlled study |
To test the effects of walking up and down stairs at home on a range of CVD and MetS risk factors |
52 sedentary females (18–45 years) from four different Cyprus companies |
-
•
Three interventions: (1) home based stair climb (10 floors of climbing), (2) gym based stair climb (Leekon stair machine – 50 steps/min, 143 steps, 2–5 bouts/day); (3) control
-
•
5 days a week for period of 8 weeks.
-
•
progressed till 5 ascents per day in the last two weeks
|
-
•
Fat percentage: 7 skinfold
-
•
VO2 max: 20 m shuttle run
-
•
Leg power: counter movement jump
-
•
Metabolic fitness: TC, TG, VLDL, Glucose, HDL
|
-
•
significantly increased aerobic fitness (VO2 max and lactate) in stir climb group
-
•
Slight increase of jump height in CMJ in experimental group (p ≤ 0.01)
-
•
HDL ↑ and VLDL ↓
-
•
Home-based stair climbing was responsible for lowering fasting blood glucose (p = 0.03)
|
Mir, 201728
|
Malaysia |
Non-randomised controlled study |
To compare the effectiveness of 4 weeks stair climbing intervention with walking on cardiometabolic outcomes |
-
•
37 young adults (18–25 years)
-
•
Healthy with no apparent illness
-
•
living a sedentary lifestyle.
|
-
•
Three interventions: (1) full stair climb (7 floors, 14 flights); (2) half stair climb (3.5 floors, 7 flights) and one-mile treadmill walk
-
•
Self-selected speed
-
•
Twice day, 5 days a week and 4 weeks
|
|
-
•
Significant improvement in VO2 max (11.66 ml/kg/min) in full stair climb while no significant difference in other two groups
-
•
No statistical difference in the physical fitness index within and between groups
-
•
significant reduction (p < 0.005) in time taken to complete the intervention in the all three groups
|
Ozaki, 201929
|
Japan |
Experimental study |
To explore the additive effects of stair-climb to routine walk program on muscle thickness and strength. |
-
•
15 elderly participants (age >65 years)
-
•
free of any overt chronic disease,
-
•
not past or current smokers,
-
•
not taking any medications
|
-
•
Two interventions: (1) walking alone; (2) walking + stair climb
-
•
17 weeks progressive walking (self selected speed initially progressing to 65–80 % HRR during final weeks
-
•
Walk + stair group had additional incremental step training
|
|
-
•
Except lower leg, thigh muscle thickness improved within condition
-
•
After 6 weeks, knee flexion and extension strength improved
-
•
No interaction effects between group x time was noted
-
•
Stair climbing did not provide additional training effects
|
Paschalis, 201330
|
Cyprus |
Parallel group controlled trial |
To compare the effect of two sessions of stair descending versus stair ascending exercise on muscle performance and health-related parameters in young healthy men |
|
-
•
Two interventions: (1) a stair descending group and (2) a stair ascending group
-
•
Automatic escalator device
-
•
5 min stair climbing/bout, 5 bouts/day
-
•
Speed was set at 60 steps/min
|
-
•
Creatinine kinase (index of muscle damage)
-
•
Isometric knee extensor – isokinetic dynamometer
-
•
Blood chemistry: insulin sensitivity, blood lipid profile and redox status
-
•
during 1st session and 2nd session interspersed with 3 weeks.
|
-
•
Significant interaction for ROM, torque and DOMS
-
•
Insulin resistance due to muscle damage due to bout 1
-
•
Bout 1 of ascending or descending stair climb causes more muscle damage
-
•
Successive stair climbs positively influence insulin sensitivity and lipid profile
-
•
stair descending exercise systematically caused greater elevations in insulin sensitivity indices compared to stair ascending exercise.
|
Rafiei, 202031
|
Canada |
Randomised cross over study |
to investigate brief stair climbing exercise “snacks” could lower postprandial insulin, glucose, and free fatty acids responses during prolonged sitting |
N = 22 (12 healthy weight, 11 overweight) |
completed two interventions: 1) sedentary (9-h sitting) and 2) stair climbing snacks (8 × 15–30 s once per hour). |
|
Healthy weight-
•
no significant differences between conditions for total (9-h) insulin AUC (P = 0.24, d = 0.4), total glucose AUC (P = 0.17, d = 0.48), total non-esterified fatty acid AUC (P = 0.22, d = 0.4), or total TG AUC (P = 0.72).
Overweight
-
•
total insulin AUC (−16.5 %, P = 0.036, d = 0.94) and total NEFA AUC (−21 %, P = 0.016, d = 1.2) were significantly lower in SS versus SED.
-
•
No differences were found for total glucose and triglyceride AUC (all, P > 0.31)
|
Takaishi, 201232
|
Japan |
Non-randomised cross over study |
To explore the effectiveness of stair climb interventions on postprandial glucose in glucose impaired participants |
11 healthy participants. Not engaging in regular and strenuous ex. |
Two visits: (1) STAIR: stair climbing visit: 80–110 steps/min (moderate intensity corresponding to 60 % HRR and 13 RPE); (2) WALK: self selected walk speed on 650 m course for 2 h for 6 min at 90th min |
|
-
•
At 90th min, no diff in glucose levels between WALK and stair
-
•
At 105th min, blood glucose levels lower in STAIR compared to WALK
-
•
STAIR reduced by 2.5 mmol/dl and WALK reduced by 0.7 mmol/dl
-
•
Blood lactate increased after STAIR compared to WALK
|
Takaishi, 201415
|
Japan |
Narrative review |
To summarize the studies that have investigated the effects of stair-ascending exercise |
Inference
-
•
Eight studies (1975–2010).
-
•
Work intensity on stairs was found to be similar to that of uphill treadmill walk and loaded bicycle training
-
•
Oxygen consumption was estimated for the stair climbing bouts
-
•
CRF and metabolic fitness can be improved by accumulating bouts of short-duration exercise with stairs
-
•
VO2 for ascending = 33 ml/kg/min while ascending and descending exercise is 19.2 ml/kg/min
-
•
5 min stair climbing exercise reduced the blood glucose concentration by 60 mg/dl (3.3 mmoL/l)
-
•
stair climbing improves CVD health and fitness, but should be prescribed for elderly with caution
|
Takaishi, 201733
|
Japan |
Experimental cross over trial |
to confirm acute effect of stair exercise on postprandial hyperglycaemia by comparing it cycle exercise performed at the same workload |
|
Two visits: (1) ST-EX: descending stair (60–65 % HRR, RPE – 13–14), 21 steps, 8–10 reps; STEP RATE – 80–110 (2) Bi-EX: 50–60 reps/minute progressing to predetermined workload |
|
-
•
blood glucose level ↓ between 90 and 105 min after a meal was significantly greater for ST-EX (−4.0 ± 0.7 mmol/L) than for BI-EX (−2.7 ± 0.9 mmol/L).
-
•
Serum insulin levels did not differ between the groups.
• VO2 max for ST-EX was ↑ than that for BI-EX,
-
•
Lactate level and RER for ST-EX were ↓ than BI-EX.
|
Whittaker AC, 20218
|
Netherlands |
Secondary analysis study |
to explore the association between stair climbing and the metabolic syndrome. |
|
Nurses enquired the exposure of “Do you climb stairs daily?’ (yes/no)” |
-
•
TG and HDL (enzymatic colorimetric methods)
-
•
glucose levels (photometric assay)
-
•
waist circumference, BP through sphygmanometer
-
•
Composite scores for Metabolic syndrome (MetS)
|
-
•
who did not climb stairs daily were at greater risk for MetS (OR = 1.90),
-
•
the components affected high blood glucose, (OR = 1.73), TG (OR = 1.49) and BP (OR = 1.50).
|
Yamaji, 202134
|
Japan |
Cross sectional study |
To explore the relation between daily stair climbing activity and vascular function |
|
Three groups based on their daily stair climbing habit: no stairs group, climbing stairs to the 2nd-floor group, and climbing stairs to the ≥3rd-floor group |
|
-
•
FMD (3.3 %) ↑ in stair group >3 floors compared to stair <2 floors and no stair group
-
•
↓NID seen in no stairs (7.4 %) group compared to < 2 floors (10.9 %) and >3 floors (11.3 %)
-
•
Endothelial function impaired in no stair group
|