Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 23;45:102258. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102258

Table 3.

Post-op status analysis.

Group A (Case series summary) Group B (Case reports summary) Combined result
Post-op improvements of local symptoms Present 105 (100 %) 61 (95 %) 166 (99 %)
Absent 0 3 (5 %) 3 (1 %)
In Group A, Only 105 cases out of 159 had local symptoms, and all had improvements, Group B, 64 out of 83 cases had local symptoms. Among them, 61 had improvements.
Post-op neurological symptoms Complete recovery 74 (66.3 %) 29 (40 %) 103 (55 %)
Residual motor symptoms 11 (10 %) 25 (34.5%)
  • ●

    All have involvement of TA, and only one case has residual involvement of TA and peronei

  • ●

    2 cases (C Pagnoux et al.52 and G Khan et al.96) described worsening of the motor symptoms.

  • ●

    3 cases (G khan et al.,96 C Pagnoux et al.52 and Schmidt I85) described no improvement in the motor symptoms.

 36 (19 %)
Residual sensory symptoms 3 (2.7 %) 4 (5.5%)
  • ●

    3 cases (J Kelm et al.,49 E D Stamatis et al.67 and D Nikolopoulos et al.75) described only SPN residual symptoms.

  • ●

    1 case by M R Katz et al.42 shows residual involvement of DPN.

 7 (4.5 %)
Residual motor and sensory both 23 (21 %) 10 (13%) 33 (18.5 %)
No data specified by author 0 5 (7 %) 5 (3 %)
In Group A, Only 111 cases out of 159 had neurological symptoms and Group B, 73 out of 83 cases had neurological symptoms.