Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD009905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009905.pub2

Darrow 2011.

Methods Study design: controlled before‐after cross‐sectional study  
Sampling frame: Florida adults
Collection method: State of Florida HIV incidence data
Description of the community coalition: Florida International University and 3 community‐based organizations that served African American, Hispanic, Haitian, and Afro‐Caribbean communities formed a coalition in response to REACH 2010 funding with the aim of reducing disparities in HIV among minority young adults through community awareness and education. The University served as the lead agency and contracted with the CBOs annually to provide educational outreach
Participants Communities: Broward County, Florida
Country: USA
Ages included in assessment: adults  
Reasons provided for selection of intervention community: minority population with high HIV/AIDS rates 
Intervention community (population size): South Florida counties of Broward, Palm Beach, and Miami‐Dade (population size not provided)
Comparison community (population size): North Florida counties of Duval, Hillsborough, and Orange (population size not provided)
Interventions Name of intervention: Broward County REACH HIV Prevention
Theory: none reported
Aim: to improve levels of awareness of the HIV/AIDS problems among minority young adults, to increase perceptions of the seriousness of the local AIDS problem, and to stimulate action to reduce HIV/AIDS in minority communities 
Description of costs and resources: 6 community health outreach workers, graduate students, and other university staff delivered interventions. US$103,500 provided annually to 3 CBOs; funding amount to University not reported  
Components of the intervention: educational materials in the form of posters, pamphlets, bus advertisements, newspaper articles, and radio and television public service announcements, as well as community health fairs and poetry competitions
Start date: 2000 
Duration: 4 years
Outcomes Outcomes and measures: annual HIV incidence rates per 100,000 
Time points: 1998 to 2006
Notes Outcomes measured at population level using state HIV incidence data
Funding source: government
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Non‐randomized
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Non‐randomized
Baseline outcome measurement similar Low risk Statewide HIV surveillance data
Baseline characteristics similar High risk Baseline differences in HIV incidence between intervention and control
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Statewide HIV surveillance data
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Statewide surveillance system data
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Non‐randomized
Protection against contamination Low risk Counties not adjacent
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Statewide HIV surveillance data
Other bias High risk Included counties in the intervention group that received community outreach