Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD009905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009905.pub2

Rothman 1999.

Methods Study design: controlled before‐after study (independent samples)
Sampling frame: children age 6 years of age and younger living in predominantly African American census tracts in Philadelphia
Sampling method: not clearly stated, but appears to be associated with where children were brought for blood lead level testing (self selection). Control census tracts matched by demographics and housing older than 1950
Collection method: elevated blood lead levels reported to the City of Phildelphia
Description of the community coalition: The coalition was formed to address lead awareness in North Central Philadelphia; it originated from a pre‐existing community‐academic partnership. The group was convened by the City Lead Poisoning Prevention Program and the Temple Health Connection, a community‐based academic nursing practice, and included the Department of Health, a university, the local housing authority, community residents, the Salvation Army, and other grassroots community‐based organizations
Participants Communities: Philadelphia neighborhoods with a high proportion of residents who were African American and below the poverty level, with a high proportion of housing built before 1950
Country: USA
Ages included in assessment: ≤ 6 years old (n = 890)
Reasons provided for selection of intervention community: Targeted neighborhood was economically disadvantaged, underserved, and at risk because of lead in the environment
Intervention community (population size): 4 census tracts of North Central Philadelphia (population size not reported)
Comparison community (population size): 4 additional census tracts within Philadelphia that matched as closely as possible the experimental population on % housing built before 1950, % African American, and % below poverty level (population size not reported)
Interventions Name of intervention: Lead Awareness: North Philly Style
Theory: not reported
Aim: to implement and evaluate community‐developed, community‐based strategies that address childhood lead poisoning
Description of costs and resources: after‐school and camp programs with a focus on lead education provided for children through participating agencies. ‘Block captains’ who were residents of the targeted community invited neighbors to block parties and provided educational materials, lead remediation materials, and gifts. Cost data not reported
Components of the intervention: educational after‐school programs and camps for children; informational “block parties” in local churches and recreation centers for adults, with educational materials and free lead‐remediation materials
Start date: 1997
Duration: 3 years
Outcomes Outcomes and measures: change in elevated blood lead levels (> 10 micrograms/Dl) in children (proportion of blood lead levels over certain thresholds) (f/u intervention: n = 360; comparison: n = 530)
Time points: baseline (1997) and follow‐up (3 years later)
Notes Funder: US National Institute for Nursing Research
Funding source: government
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Intervention not randomly assigned
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk No allocation concealment
Baseline outcome measurement similar Unclear risk Outcome (proportion above lead level cutoff) shifted during study and baseline levels not presented with final results
Baseline characteristics similar High risk Control census tracts matched on housing built before 1950, % African American, and poverty, with some differences evident
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Mandatory reporting of elevated blood lead levels to City of Phildelphia. Objectively measured outcome should not be affected by lack of blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Completeness of reporting elevated blood lead levels to City of Phildelphia not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Objectively measured outcome should not be affected by lack of blinding
Protection against contamination Unclear risk No statement regarding protection against contamination. Proximity of experimental and control census tracts unclear
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Exact results for blood lead level ≥ 20 described in initial paper as main outcome variable reported only in brief; no statistical testing provided