Skip to main content
. 1998 Oct;64(10):3900–3909. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.10.3900-3909.1998

TABLE 4.

Comparison of dry weights determined by flow cytometry with independent measurements

Organism Measured
Computed
Computed/ measured dry wt
Dry wt (fg/cell)a Vol (μm3/cell)b Buoyant density (pg/μm3) Dry wt/ wet wtc Wet wt (fg/cell)d Dry wt (fg/cell)e Vol (μm3/cell)f mg
C. oligotrophus 35.7 0.16 1.07 0.179 199 30.7 0.186 1.023 0.86
28.3 0.13 1.07 0.179 158 25.0 0.148 1.023 0.88
41.3 0.25 1.055 0.141 293 37.2 0.278 1.020 0.90
57.7 0.24 1.055 0.141 409 35.7 0.388 1.020 0.62
Marinobacter sp. strain T2 54.0 0.24 1.075 0.192 281 49.6 0.261 1.025 0.92
46.2 0.22 1.075 0.192 240 45.5 0.214 1.025 0.98
E. coli 322 0.81 1.10 0.286 1,128 255 1.03 1.037 0.79
a

From equation 4 and Fig. 2. Determined by flow cytometry. 

b

Determined with a Coulter Counter. 

c

Xdry/Xwet (equation 1), determined with measured buoyant densities and a ρdry of 1.39 g/cm3 for C. oligotrophus and Marinobacter sp. strain T2 and of 1.35 g/cm3 for E. coli

d

Dry weight from flow cytometry divided by (Xdry/Xwet) from buoyant density. 

e

Coulter volume × buoyant density × (Xdry/Xwet). 

f

Wet weight divided by buoyant density (equation 3). 

g

From equation 2.