Table 2.
Brief reviews on studies related to microteaching
Author (year) | Article title | Study design and study settings | Sample size (n) and age group | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
Madhu Gupta et al. (2016) | Improving quality of home-based postnatal care by microteaching of multipurpose workers in rural and urban slum areas of Chandigarh, India: A pilot study | A longitudinal study design Chandigarh | 12 health-care workers for 93,151 (each HW 8000 population) Age - 26–45 years | After three rounds of video recording, the overall skill evaluation score, infant examination skill, maternal examination skill, and counseling increased from baseline values[2] |
Samir Kumar Praharaj (2016) | Can microteaching be used for teaching postgraduate psychiatry residents in a small group? | A cross-sectional, observational study Kasturba Medical College, Manipal | 12 PG psychiatry students | All of the speakers said the microteaching session helped them comprehend the subject better. The findings indicate that microteaching may be utilized to instruct psychiatry residents[11] |
Vijay Kautilya Dayanindhi et al. (2018) | Effectiveness of microteaching as a method of developing teaching competence among in-service medical teachers | A prospective experimental study Shri Sathya Sai Medical and research institute, Chennai | 30 faculties Age - 30–55 years | After five sessions of microteaching, participant’s behavior exhibited a statistically significant improvement. While many of the participants said this strategy was time and resource-consuming, they all agreed it was beneficial[12] |
Najma Baseer et al. (2020) | Micro-feedback skills workshop impacts perceptions and practices of doctoral faculty | A quasi-experimental study KMU Peshawar | Supervisor - 24 Supervisees - 34 Age - >20 years | On OSTE scores, a learning increase of 56% was seen. There was no discernible variation in views between the two groups following the session. Surprisingly, instructors altered their perspectives toward those held by their peers[8] |
Dennis Murphy Odo et al. (2021) | An action research investigation of the impact of using online feedback videos to promote selfrefection on the microteaching of preservice EFL teachers | A observational study South Korea | 14 preservice teachers Age - 21–27 years | The outcomes of this study revealed three responses. First, they thought that taking part in the videotaped feedback sessions had taught them new teaching techniques, ideas, and procedures. A second data-driven theme was the improved feedback provided through video. They also noted that they may revisit the lecture several times[5] |
OSTE=Objective structured teaching examination, KMU=Khyber Medical University, EFL=English as Foreign language, HW=Healthcare Worker