Table 2.

COX regression analysis of the prognostic correlation between PRPF19 and bladder cancer.

Characteristics	Total (N)	Univariate analysis		Multivariate analysis
		Hazard ratio (95% CI)	P value	Hazard ratio (95% CI)	P value
Age	56
≥65	38	Reference
<65	18	1.338 (0.653 - 2.743)	0.427
Gender	56
male	47	Reference
female	9	1.339 (0.547 - 3.276)	0.522
Tumor size	56
≥4	29	Reference
<4	27	1.708 (0.838 - 3.483)	0.141
Grade	56
High	51	Reference
Low	5	0.722 (0.171 - 3.041)	0.657
pT-stage	56
≥T2	41	Reference
<T2	15	0.819 (0.367 - 1.830)	0.627
pTNM-Stage	56
>II	30	Reference		Reference
≤II	26	0.418 (0.200 - 0.872)	0.020	0.640 (0.282 - 1.454)	0.286
External aggression	56
yes	5	Reference		Reference
No	51	0.355 (0.135 - 0.931)	0.035	0.768 (0.240 - 2.451)	0.655
Lymph node metastasis	56
yes	9	Reference		Reference
No	47	0.441 (0.188 - 1.033)	0.060	0.822 (0.290 - 2.330)	0.712
PRPF19 expression	56
High	36	Reference		Reference
Low	20	0.219 (0.082 - 0.580)	0.002	0.274 (0.099 - 0.758)	0.013