Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 20;7:21. doi: 10.1186/s41824-023-00181-6

Table 5.

An inverse correlation between normalised concentrations and subject BMI/weight (kg)

NC within VOIs
F RC RAP RPP LC LAP LPP OB T M P
BMI (r)
A − 0.570** − 0.422** − 0.377** − 0.463** − 0.439** − 0.540** − 0.415** − 0.516** − 0.286* − 0.425** − 0.552**
B − 0.656* − 0.711** − 0.545* − 0.581* − 0.375 − 0.572* − 0.765** − 0.682** − 0.096 − 0.124 − 0.558*
S − 0.813** − 0.533 − 0.558 − 0.195 − 0.440 − 0.595 − 0.696* − 0.502 − 0.133 − 0.524 − 0.651*
Weight (r)
A − 0.687** − 0.525** − 0.474** − 0.575** − 0.543** − 0.591** − 0.461** − 0.689** − 0.364* − 0.564** − 0.640**
B − 0.622* − 0.615* − 0.563* − 0.542* − 0.395 − 0.494 − 0.530 − 0.448 − 0.056 − 0.124 − 0.452
S − 0.941** − 0.740** − 0.730* − 0.296 − 0.607* − 0.746** − 0.747** − 0.738** − 0.367 − 0.764** − 0.793**

Significance represented at either 0.05 level* or 0.01 level**

NC = Normalised concentration; VOI = volume of interest (F = frontal; RC = right caudate; RAP = right anterior putamen; RPP = right posterior putamen; LC = left caudate; LAP = left anterior putamen; LPP = left posterior putamen; OB = occipital background; T = thalamus; M = midbrain; P = pons); r = Pearson correlation; A = abnormal scan group; B = borderline scan group; S = scan without evidence of dopaminergic deficit group