Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 29;8(11):2294–2306. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.08.034

Table 2.

Summary of results of primary and secondary efficacy measures (FAS)

Measures Evocalcet (n = 199) Cinacalcet (n = 196) Difference between groups (evocalcet − cinacalcet),
P-value
Mean percentage change in iPTH (95% CI) −34.7 (−40.8, −28.5) −30.2 (−36.3, −24.2) −4.4 (−13.1, 4.3),
0.000
Target iPTH level ≥30% (percentage change ≤ −30%) from baseline (95% CI) 67.3 (60.2, 74.5) 58.7 (51.2, 66.2) 8.6 (−1.8, 19.1),
0.000
Target iPTH level (≥150 pg/ml and ≤300 pg/ml) (95% CI) 33.8 (26.8, 40.8) 34.1 (26.9, 41.2) −0.2 (−10.2, 9.8),
0.003

CI, confidence interval; FAS, full analysis set, PTH, parathyroid hormone.

95% CI values were derived by t statistic. The noninferiority margin was 15%. P-values were calculated by t-test.