Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 17;102(46):e36066. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036066

Table 4.

Univariate analysis of factors associated with overall survival of patients with LSCC*.

Variable Comparison HR (95%CI) P value
Sex Female vs Male 0.05 (0.00–1699063.23) .731
Age ≥66 vs <66 yr 2.34 (0.45–12.05) .310
Smoking Yes vs No 0.55 (0.12–2.47) .428
Drinking Yes vs No 0.45 (0.10–2.00) .293
Tumor site Non-glottic vs Glottic 3.32 (0.64–17.14) .151
TNM stage III + IV vs I + II 6.81 (0.82–56.85) .076
T stage 3 + 4 vs 1 + 2 7.82 (0.94–65.25) .058
Lymphatic metastasis Yes vs No 0.88 (0.11–7.28) .902
Lymphovascular invasion Yes vs No 1.93 (0.43–8.62) .390
Perineurial invasion Yes vs No 2.88 (0.54–15.43) .217
Differentiation Moderately + Poorly vs Highly 3.75 (0.45–31.18) .221
TC1 Positive vs Negative 30.10 (0.01–68114.11) .388
Chibby Positive vs Negative 1.46 (0.33–6.55) .621
β-catenin Positive vs Negative 40.98 (0.06–27977.50) .265
TC1/Chibby TC1+/Chibby− vs othersa 0.68 (0.28–1.66) .392

CI = confidence interval, LSCC = laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, TC1 = thyroid cancer 1, TNM = tumor node metastases.

a

“Others” represented the groups of TC1+/Chibby+, TC1-/Chibby−, and TC1-/Chibby+.

*

All statistical significance was determined using the univariate Cox proportional hazards model. P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.