Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 21;17(6):1532–1544. doi: 10.1007/s12072-023-10577-y

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazard models for the risk of portal vein thrombosis

Patient characteristics Portal vein thrombosis during follow-up (n = 155)
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR 95% CI p value HR 95% CI p value
Age (years) 1.04 0.97–1.10 0.260
MELD (points) 1.02 0.88–1.18 0.836
HVPG (mmHg) 1.02 0.91–1.14 0.796
VWF-Ag (%) 1.04 0.99–1.09 0.126
VWF-N (ng/mL) 1.02 0.99–1.06 0.229
VWF-A (ng/mL) 1.03 0.98–1.08 0.323
ADAMTS13-Act (per 10%) 0.77 0.63–0.95 0.014
CRP (mg/dL) 1.34 0.31–5.79 0.696

Statistical analysis: Cox proportional hazard models with backwards elimination were performed to assess risk factors for the incidence of portal vein thrombosis during follow-up. p values < 0.05 are indicated in bold

ADAMTS13 a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13, HVPG hepatic venous pressure gradient, MELD model of end stage liver disease, VWF-Ag von Willebrand factor antigen, VWF-N released N-terminal propeptide of VWF, VWF-A neoepitope of ADAMTS13-mediated degradation of VWF, CRP C-reactive protein