Specific learning disorders (SLDs) are neurodevelopmental disorders that are typically diagnosed in early school-aged children, although may not be recognized until adulthood. They are characterized by persistent impairment in at least one of three major areas: reading, written expression, and/or mathematics. For almost a century, there has been much discussion on the neurobiological causes of learning difficulties. The precise neuroanatomical nature of this disorder has only recently begun to emerge. In recent years, researchers have made significant advances in the study of learning disabilities in particular in terms of comprehension of cognitive and anatomical mechanisms.
The understanding of neural mechanisms of learning disabilities is useful for their management and cognitive treatment. The advent of functional neuroimaging methods has also identified anatomical networks and neurological learning systems that have contributed to the knowledge of the neurobiology of learning deficits. On the other side, neuropsychological assessment, with comprehensive tests or specific cognitive tasks, has proved to be useful in analyzing specific cognitive deficits to find potential targets of intervention for cognitive compensation.
Recent advances in cognitive neuroscience have shed light on the intricate neurobiological underpinnings of these disorders, offering a deeper understanding of their genetic, neural, and environmental origins. Neuroimaging studies using techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have provided crucial insights into the neural correlates of different types of SLDs.
Dyslexia, characterized by difficulties in reading and language processing, has been associated with abnormalities in brain regions such as the left temporoparietal cortex and the Visual Word Form Area (VWFA). 1 The VWFA, located in the left occipitotemporal cortex, plays a pivotal role in word recognition and phonological processing.1, 2 Dyslexic individuals exhibit altered activation and connectivity patterns in these regions, contributing to their reading challenges.
Dysgraphia, affecting writing skills, has been linked to disruptions in brain regions such as the premotor cortex and the parietal cortex.3, 4 The premotor cortex is involved in planning and executing fine motor movements, while the parietal cortex contributes to sensorimotor integration required for handwriting.
Dyscalculia, characterized by difficulties in numerical processing, has been associated with differences in the intraparietal sulcus. 5 This brain region is critical for numerical cognition and mathematical processing, and its altered function in dyscalculic individuals contributes to their challenges in understanding and manipulating numbers.
Genetic factors play a substantial role in the etiology of SLDs. Twin and family studies have shown heritability estimates ranging from 30% to 70% for various learning disorders. 6 Candidate genes related to neural development, neurotransmitter regulation, and myelination have been implicated in SLDs. 7 However, gene-environment interactions, including early experiences and educational interventions, also significantly influence SLD development. 8 The neurobiology of SLDs offers hope through the lens of neuroplasticity.
Targeted interventions, such as phonics-based reading programs for dyslexia, have demonstrated the brain’s ability to undergo structural and functional changes. 9 These interventions lead to enhanced connectivity and activation in brain regions crucial for reading, reflecting the brain’s adaptability in response to training. Interprofessional care plays vital role in the identification and management of learning disabilities. 10
Cognitive neuroscience has illuminated the intricate interplay between genetic predisposition, neural structures, and environmental influences in the development of SLDs. Understanding the neurobiology of SLDs provides a foundation for tailored interventions and educational strategies that harness neuroplasticity, ultimately empowering individuals with SLDs to overcome academic challenges and thrive.
References
- 1.Shaywitz SE and Shaywitz BA.. Paying attention to reading: The neurobiology of reading and dyslexia. Dev Psychopathol 2008; 20(4): 1329–1349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dehaene S and Cohen L.. The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends Cogn Sci 2011; 15(6): 254–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Richlan F. Developmental dyslexia: Dysfunction of a left hemisphere reading network. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8: 1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Berninger VW and Richards T.. Brain literacy for educators and psychologists . Academic Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rykhlevskaia E, Uddin LQ, Kondos L, et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of developmental dyscalculia: Combined evidence from morphometry and tractography. Front Hum Neurosci 2009; 3: 51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pennington BF. From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition 2006; 101(2): 385–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Scerri TS and Schulte-Körne G.. Genetics of developmental dyslexia. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2010; 19(3): 179–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Plomin R and Kovas Y.. Generalist genes and learning disabilities. Psychol Bull 2005; 131(4): 592–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA, Pugh KR, et al. Effect of reading disability on brain activity in children with dyslexia. Neuropsychology 2004; 18(4): 581–590. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dominguez O and Carugno P.. Learning disability . In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554371/ [Google Scholar]