Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 20;5:15. doi: 10.1186/s42522-023-00091-4

Table 3.

Attitudes of Ohio-based producers (n = 57) that participated in a self-administered and anonymous electronic survey regarding ticks and tick-borne diseases

Question n (%)
Do you think that ticks pose a risk to your health or the health of your employees/coworkers?
 Yes, major health risks (debilitating or life-threatening) 28 (49.1%)
 Yes, minor health risks (short-term or not life-threatening) 27 (47.4%)
 No answer 2 (3.5%)
Do you think that ticks pose a risk to the health of the animals that you work with?
 Yes, major health risks (life-threatening or serious loss of production) 31 (54.4%)
 Yes, minor health risks (short term illness or minor loss of production) 20 (35.1%)
 No 4 (7.0%)
 No answer 2 (3.5%)
Considering the past 5 years, have you noticed a change in the number of ticks that you encounter?
 Yes, I used to see more ticks than I do now 14 (24.6%)
 Yes, I used to see fewer ticks than I do now 26 (45.6%)
 No, the number of ticks I see hasn’t changed 8 (14.0%)
 Not sure 6 (10.5%)
 No answer 3 (5.3%)
How common do you think tick-borne disease is in humans in Ohio?
 Rare 8 (14.0%)
 Occurs occasionally 32 (56.1%)
 Very common 13 (22.9%)
 No answer 4 (7.0%)
How common do you think tick-borne disease is in livestock in Ohio?
 Rare 6 (10.5%)
 Occurs occasionally 28 (49.1%)
 Very common 18 (31.6%)
 No answer 5 (8.8%)
Do you think that your work on the farm puts you at higher risk for tick-borne disease than the average person in Ohio?
 Yes 46 (80.7%)
 No 7 (12.3%)
 No answer 4 (7.0%)