Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hepatology. 2023 May 22;78(6):1922–1965. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000466

TABLE 4.

Application of UNOS-DS criteria for liver transplantation

Inclusion criteria
 HCC exceeding Milan criteria but meeting one of the following:
  1. Single lesion 5.1–8 cm

  2. 2–3 lesions each ≤ 5 cm with the sum of the maximal tumor diameters ≤ 8 cm

  3. 4–5 lesions each ≤ 3 cm with the sum of the maximal tumor diameters ≤ 8 cm

 AND absence of vascular invasion or extrahepatic disease based on cross-sectional imaging
Criteria for successful downstaging
 Residual tumor size and diameter within Milan criteria (1 lesion ≤ 5 cm, 2–3 lesions ≤ 3 cm)
  1. Only viable tumor(s) are considered; tumor diameter measurements should not include the area of necrosis from tumor-directed therapy.

  2. If there is more than one area of residual tumor enhancement, then the diameter of the entire lesion should be counted toward the overall tumor burden.

Criteria for downstaging failure and exclusion from liver transplant
  1. Progression of tumor(s) to beyond inclusion/eligibility criteria for downstaging (as defined above)

  2. Tumor invasion of a major hepatic vessel based on crosssectional imaging

  3. Lymph node involvement by tumor or extrahepatic spread of tumor

  4. Infiltrative tumor growth pattern

  5. Persistent AFP elevations > 500 ng/ml in patients who had prior AFP ≥ 1000 ng/ml

Timing of liver transplant in relation to downstaging
  1. There should be a minimum observation period of 3 mo of disease stability from successful downstaging to liver transplant

  2. Per current UNOS policy, the patient must remain within Milan criteria for 6 mo after successful downstaging before receiving MELD exception points

Abbreviations: AFP, alpha fetoprotein; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease; UNOS, United Network for Organ Sharing; UNOS-DS, UNOS Down-Staging.