Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 22;13:20444. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47135-3

Table 3.

Performance of eight low-frequency variant callers on the reference datasets N0015 and N13532.

Dataset Tool No. of calls a No. of variants b True positive False positive Sensitivity (%) Precision (%) F1-score Accuracy (%)
N0015 (VAF ≈ 5%) DeepSNVMiner 499 338 328 171 97.04 65.73 0.78 99.37
MAGERI 1351 338 326 1025 96.45 24.13 0.39 96.37
smCounter2 516 338 338 178 100 65.5 0.79 99.38
UMI-VarCal 810 338 325 485 96.15 40.12 0.57 98.26
SiNVICT 506 338 326 180 96.45 64.43 0.77 99.33
outLyzer 411 338 274 137 81.07 66.67 0.73 99.30
Pisces 590 338 338 252 100 57.29 0.73 99.18
LoFreq 608 338 332 276 98.22 54.61 0.7 99.04
N13532 (VAF ≈ 0.5%) DeepSNVMiner 31 17 15 16 88.24 48.39 0.62 99.94
MAGERI 271 17 12 259 70.59 4.43 0.08 99.13
smCounter2 31 17 17 14 100 54.84 0.71 99.95
UMI-VarCal 92 17 17 75 100 18.48 0.31 99.75
SiNVICT 23 17 1 22 5.88 4.35 0.05 99.87
outLyzer 12 17 1 11 5.88 8.33 0.07 99.91
Pisces 23 17 1 22 5.88 4.35 0.05 99.97
LoFreq 752 17 14 738 82.35 1.86 0.04 97.56

The variant allele frequencies of N0015 and N13532 were around 5% and 0.5%, respectively.

anumber of calls, bnumber of variants.