Table 2.
Correlation coefficients from a two-sided Pearson test between the anthropometric factors of during the five identified landmarks of the gait cycle and the median values for the mechanical quantities hydrostatic strain and octahedral shear strain for the fracture gap and the callus area for both cohorts with a relevant difference.
| Cohort | Landmark | Anthropometric factor | Fracture gap | Callus area | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrostatic strain | Octahedral shear strain | Hydrostatic strain | Octahedral shear strain | |||
| 1 | S1 | Body weight | − 0.9866** | 0.9876** | 0.9772** | 0.9828** |
| Body height | − 0.7108** | 0.7064** | 0.7086** | 0.7264** | ||
| BMI | − 0.7221** | 0.7266** | 0.7109** | 0.7067** | ||
| Tibia Length | − 0.7086** | 0.7056** | 0.6973** | 0.7217** | ||
| 2 | Body weight | − 0.9307** | 0.9927** | 0.9788** | 0.9518** | |
| Body height | − 0.5873** | 0.6621** | 0.5590** | 0.5891** | ||
| BMI | − 0.6748** | 0.7658** | 0.7423** | 0.6971** | ||
| Tibia Length | − 0.6211** | 0.6586** | 0.5938** | 0.6243** | ||
| 1 | S2 | Body weight | − 0.9922** | 0.9904** | 0.9817** | 0.9869** |
| Body height | − 0.5798** | 0.5937** | 0.6223** | 0.6155** | ||
| BMI | − 0.8000** | 0.7898** | 0.7612** | 0.7723** | ||
| Tibia Length | − 0.5972** | 0.6116** | 0.6404** | 0.6312** | ||
| 2 | Body weight | − 0.9894** | 0.9858** | 0.9824** | 0.9808** | |
| Body height | − 0.5862** | 0.6106** | 0.6175** | 0.6357** | ||
| BMI | − 0.8029** | 0.7848** | 0.7751** | 0.7640** | ||
| Tibia Length | − 0.0619** | 0.6430** | 0.6520** | 0.6693** | ||
| 1 | S3 | Body weight | − 0.9891** | 0.9878** | 0.9798** | 0.9816** |
| Body height | − 0.6889** | 0.7018** | 0.7142** | 0.7324** | ||
| BMI | − 0.7415** | 0.7301** | 0.7107** | 0.7005** | ||
| Tibia Length | − 0.6853** | 0.7003** | 0.7054** | 0.7279** | ||
| 2 | Body weight | − 0.9383** | 0.9280** | 0.9800** | 0.9352** | |
| Body height | − 0.5651** | 0.5895** | 0.5700** | 0.5996** | ||
| BMI | − 0.6965** | 0.6709** | 0.7375** | 0.6723** | ||
| Tibia Length | − 0.5978** | 0.6215** | 0.6052** | 0.6340** | ||
| 1 | S4 | Body weight | − 0.9919** | 0.9948** | 0.9799** | 0.9879** |
| Body height | − 0.6672** | 0.7831** | 0.6707** | 0.6847** | ||
| BMI | − 0.7610** | 0.7954** | 0.7425** | 0.7443** | ||
| Tibia Length | − 0.6628** | 0.6586** | 0.6568** | 0.6774** | ||
| 2 | Body weight | − 0.9369** | 0.9465** | 0.9836** | 0.9541** | |
| Body height | − 0.5369** | 0.5444** | 0.5153** | 0.5398** | ||
| BMI | − 0.7128** | 0.7187** | 0.7747** | 0.7302** | ||
| Tibia Length | − 0.5706** | 0.5776** | 0.5501** | 0.5748** | ||
| 1 | S5 | Body weight | − 0.7417** | 0.9393** | − 0.8601** | 0.9720** |
| Body height | − 0.1744 | 0.5948** | − 0.9589** | 0.8739** | ||
| BMI | − 0.9412** | 0.6796** | − 0.4467** | 0.6846** | ||
| Tibia Length | − 0.1360 | 0.6279** | − 0.9495** | 0.8549** | ||
| 2 | Body weight | − 0.7957** | 0.9969** | − 0.7829** | 0.9721** | |
| Body height | − 0.1349 | 0.6647** | − 0.9286** | 0.7963** | ||
| BMI | − 0.9327** | 0.8921** | − 0.4743** | 0.7872** | ||
| Tibia Length | − 0.0652 | 0.6258** | − 0.9367** | 0.7699** | ||
Only the four highlighted cases show no relevant correlation.
**The correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-sided).